From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Dipendra Khadka <kdipendra88@gmail.com>,
andrew@lunn.ch, florian.fainelli@broadcom.com,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Dipendra Khadka <kdipendra88@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] net: Add error pointer check in bcmsysport.c
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 03:44:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202409240305.PgIkDx1K-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240923053900.1310-1-kdipendra88@gmail.com>
Hi Dipendra,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on net/main]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Dipendra-Khadka/net-Add-error-pointer-check-in-bcmsysport-c/20240923-134407
base: net/main
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240923053900.1310-1-kdipendra88%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2 net] net: Add error pointer check in bcmsysport.c
config: i386-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240924/202409240305.PgIkDx1K-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240924/202409240305.PgIkDx1K-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409240305.PgIkDx1K-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcmsysport.c: In function 'bcm_sysport_map_queues':
>> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcmsysport.c:2341:24: error: implicit declaration of function 'PRT_ERR'; did you mean 'PTR_ERR'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
2341 | return PRT_ERR(dp);
| ^~~~~~~
| PTR_ERR
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +2341 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcmsysport.c
2330
2331 static int bcm_sysport_map_queues(struct net_device *dev,
2332 struct net_device *slave_dev)
2333 {
2334 struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_port_from_netdev(slave_dev);
2335 struct bcm_sysport_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
2336 struct bcm_sysport_tx_ring *ring;
2337 unsigned int num_tx_queues;
2338 unsigned int q, qp, port;
2339
2340 if (IS_ERR(dp))
> 2341 return PRT_ERR(dp);
2342
2343 /* We can't be setting up queue inspection for non directly attached
2344 * switches
2345 */
2346 if (dp->ds->index)
2347 return 0;
2348
2349 port = dp->index;
2350
2351 /* On SYSTEMPORT Lite we have twice as less queues, so we cannot do a
2352 * 1:1 mapping, we can only do a 2:1 mapping. By reducing the number of
2353 * per-port (slave_dev) network devices queue, we achieve just that.
2354 * This need to happen now before any slave network device is used such
2355 * it accurately reflects the number of real TX queues.
2356 */
2357 if (priv->is_lite)
2358 netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(slave_dev,
2359 slave_dev->num_tx_queues / 2);
2360
2361 num_tx_queues = slave_dev->real_num_tx_queues;
2362
2363 if (priv->per_port_num_tx_queues &&
2364 priv->per_port_num_tx_queues != num_tx_queues)
2365 netdev_warn(slave_dev, "asymmetric number of per-port queues\n");
2366
2367 priv->per_port_num_tx_queues = num_tx_queues;
2368
2369 for (q = 0, qp = 0; q < dev->num_tx_queues && qp < num_tx_queues;
2370 q++) {
2371 ring = &priv->tx_rings[q];
2372
2373 if (ring->inspect)
2374 continue;
2375
2376 /* Just remember the mapping actual programming done
2377 * during bcm_sysport_init_tx_ring
2378 */
2379 ring->switch_queue = qp;
2380 ring->switch_port = port;
2381 ring->inspect = true;
2382 priv->ring_map[qp + port * num_tx_queues] = ring;
2383 qp++;
2384 }
2385
2386 return 0;
2387 }
2388
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-23 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-23 5:38 [PATCH v2 net] net: Add error pointer check in bcmsysport.c Dipendra Khadka
2024-09-23 16:19 ` Simon Horman
2024-09-23 16:39 ` Dipendra Khadka
2024-09-23 17:27 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-09-23 19:33 ` kernel test robot
2024-09-23 19:44 ` kernel test robot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202409240305.PgIkDx1K-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=kdipendra88@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).