From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
kent.overstreet@linux.dev, surenb@google.com,
pablo@netfilter.org
Subject: Re: nf-nat-core: allocated memory at module unload.
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 21:36:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241001193606.GA10530@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bdaaef9d-4364-4171-b82b-bcfc12e207eb@candelatech.com>
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
[ CCing codetag folks ]
> Hello,
>
> I see this splat in 6.11.0 (plus a single patch to fix vrf xmit deadlock).
>
> Is this a known issue? Is it a serious problem?
Not known to me. Looks like an mm (rcu)+codetag problem.
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c:1114 module nf_nat func:nf_nat_register_fn has 256 allocated at module unload
> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 10421 at lib/alloc_tag.c:168 alloc_tag_module_unload+0x22b/0x3f0
> Modules linked in: nf_nat(-) btrfs ufs qnx4 hfsplus hfs minix vfat msdos fat
...
> Hardware name: Default string Default string/SKYBAY, BIOS 5.12 08/04/2020
> RIP: 0010:alloc_tag_module_unload+0x22b/0x3f0
> codetag_unload_module+0x19b/0x2a0
> ? codetag_load_module+0x80/0x80
> ? up_write+0x4f0/0x4f0
"Well, yes, but actually no."
At this time, kfree_rcu() has been called on all 4 objects.
Looks like kfree_rcu no longer cares even about rcu_barrier(), and
there is no kvfree_rcu_barrier() in 6.11.
The warning goes away when I replace kfree_rcu with call_rcu+kfree
plus rcu_barrier in module exit path.
But I don't think its the right thing to do.
(referring to nf_nat_unregister_fn(), kfree_rcu(priv, rcu_head);).
Reproducer:
unshare -n iptables-nft -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp
grep nf_nat /proc/allocinfo # will list 4 allocations
rmmod nft_chain_nat
rmmod nf_nat # will WARN.
Without rmmod, the 4 allocations go away after a few seconds,
grep will no longer list them and then rmmod won't splat.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-01 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-01 13:06 nf-nat-core: allocated memory at module unload Ben Greear
2024-10-01 19:36 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2024-10-04 23:13 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-10-07 11:29 ` Florian Westphal
2024-10-07 15:10 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-10-09 18:20 ` Ben Greear
2024-10-09 18:23 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-10-09 18:28 ` Ben Greear
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241001193606.GA10530@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).