From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20FF413A257; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:07:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.92.199 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728036477; cv=none; b=eJhrVFqjV8+4fuADlAzJ4psercRsp4P47jr7P4RRpKcGWmAcCg3sau75VggzDW09vxX1c2O013sSZtw0cjVrHi3wlS1tp1/cGF7Zu+Vfqw8VYZmhxNh3xEmNpGRG6nt4FLCjgG7fpo3Aq+0d5Nvk+VwbPA6uOdzZ+dUvYysO04I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728036477; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0ErE4yIzJ4CNSK9JS5t8RilNBwBBL9q+8Xv9BI3Apzo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=FGHyIvZ9evasH16Z2IrnECi8sZPrOy7st318QUJZsklEm8w2l5N9bXBdWuvDiKePLB/VbkhWDdXBhga2xhXvSyQKsiUbNQwsI+2CUNSsV/cjRM5BBBDyPzX35vO/K+5d0Dtj1JHsRXfqnS+oAnw3PgBduukc8oRQin74H34/LTI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=eeM1whbH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.92.199 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="eeM1whbH" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=xqlikl0bG4GDsTQjaI8kd8CnGG7Ve6tkOtKZn8x5TY4=; b=eeM1whbHI/rFHiUwezCgI/bZ+R HXNswooL56X6/oGJqMRyOAanoRxmGuhhvrmBk7gNA9x+tYx70Z2pE1AW8+etEkfvv5Va5X82eiI1E J8nmw/BkWyvoqGaKRu876fSGyOVNtlF49WTx4OsAvYUrJ/Xx84PMUtroGsIQGqC5VTciUQgzpzLIj ssVM8ctoBL9geCR4R0Qu8vXFYAJpXFlK9w9FxUrsMNqGgSN04t7npSKv9r8xrMq8x1AKMMo7nFUJz uLj5nHU+e38Q2uP1sjYBAWy1V0zcAccfRLmne+Cd41vJlPV2vBkOuKE69+S3l3rLyQKAqGUWq0G3Y nAC4B0Rg==; Received: from j130084.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.130.84] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1swfDr-00000003ofA-1fE6; Fri, 04 Oct 2024 10:07:43 +0000 Received: by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9B45A30083E; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 12:07:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 12:07:42 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: mhklinux@outlook.com Cc: kys@microsoft.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com, wei.liu@kernel.org, decui@microsoft.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] hyper-v: Don't assume cpu_possible_mask is dense Message-ID: <20241004100742.GO18071@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20241003035333.49261-1-mhklinux@outlook.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241003035333.49261-1-mhklinux@outlook.com> On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 08:53:28PM -0700, mhkelley58@gmail.com wrote: > > Michael Kelley (5): > x86/hyperv: Don't assume cpu_possible_mask is dense > Drivers: hv: Don't assume cpu_possible_mask is dense > iommu/hyper-v: Don't assume cpu_possible_mask is dense > scsi: storvsc: Don't assume cpu_possible_mask is dense > hv_netvsc: Don't assume cpu_possible_mask is dense Thanks, these look sane. Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)