From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Subject: [net-next PATCH v2] net: phy: Validate PHY LED OPs presence before registering
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 20:33:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241004183312.14829-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> (raw)
Validate PHY LED OPs presence before registering and parsing them.
Defining LED nodes for a PHY driver that actually doesn't supports them
is redundant and useless.
It's also the case with Generic PHY driver used and a DT having LEDs
node for the specific PHY.
Skip it and report the error with debug print enabled.
Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
---
Changes v2:
- Use phydev_dbg instead of warn
drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
index 499797646580..e3aff78945a2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
@@ -3421,6 +3421,16 @@ static int of_phy_leds(struct phy_device *phydev)
if (!leds)
return 0;
+ /* Check if the PHY driver have at least an OP to
+ * set the LEDs.
+ */
+ if (!phydev->drv->led_brightness_set &&
+ !phydev->drv->led_blink_set &&
+ !phydev->drv->led_hw_control_set) {
+ phydev_dbg(phydev, "ignoring leds node defined with no PHY driver support\n");
+ goto exit;
+ }
+
for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(leds, led) {
err = of_phy_led(phydev, led);
if (err) {
@@ -3430,6 +3440,7 @@ static int of_phy_leds(struct phy_device *phydev)
}
}
+exit:
of_node_put(leds);
return 0;
}
--
2.45.2
next reply other threads:[~2024-10-04 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-04 18:33 Christian Marangi [this message]
2024-10-08 13:08 ` [net-next PATCH v2] net: phy: Validate PHY LED OPs presence before registering Andrew Lunn
2024-10-08 13:12 ` Daniel Golle
2024-10-08 13:13 ` Christian Marangi
2024-10-08 17:02 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-10-08 17:04 ` Christian Marangi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241004183312.14829-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
--to=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).