From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 461FF1DF25E; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 13:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728394801; cv=none; b=hcO5qD+G6vKZDu14q0bObmf3mZE0YT1KVtE5hTe7iqEPMtw3utjzKCwfrCrmD1ao2WaGIlzC3SVrznWCt/PPg42pWLrxVC8qpSLHtBrwpJ4QpvFTcYzpKRtOo6kanhvvyG6E5TZj2hY6x0eey/rvdn3Rfo7983zoYA2Mht2qNoE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728394801; c=relaxed/simple; bh=F9YQQkqbHNcwgfVQyUpy1C+NloEUAj4v8A/JWR2xuAg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XPClkI8/QiADLeDo2boaTEIMlIuFJDrUhenEY9nvMkzrkF9d80h4VI9LgwIEY0zUp13OIWugq3Ox7ppo+BEuMlgWF2yacWjQVbXRJqznMuav+mAScOJhmy0ZaB1j0hUmCIVj8TbNoV7ml6HaWqqY/Wv2KA1R7vUmRbOOvSeci9Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=kTfg6/sX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="kTfg6/sX" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 011BCC4CEC7; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 13:39:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1728394800; bh=F9YQQkqbHNcwgfVQyUpy1C+NloEUAj4v8A/JWR2xuAg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=kTfg6/sXBD2y1/18g0sEw3yDVNToVFwRuusLRBZv9aXHBImEJjaM6Cd/BPRl9gmsA 35GW6M/leNtyGkoSrdIe0zlEOkxmpAzAMjcQ7/YZkmV82t95PB8DnQkHNaR+zCvcqV oMrEDVox5Dd5TC8HpyE4G4VedvR1pWSXXa757E3rtcaCVJemUmbgiHDPMoG5McdXNN GylOOLKwBC/K9pwi4y2jFy98P5TZdqc9bCWpU5jcmYQRDbWzDCnnuyrlCMUnjJq9ra tv+QqtlubIOQRLJGg+0iFarx3erQ7CJe6iWJgsw0g3oukGcvmBFoKdbGyvqZHGOYMq a0rStKiCSPbvg== Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 06:39:59 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Wei Huang Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 4/5] bnxt_en: Add TPH support in BNXT driver Message-ID: <20241008063959.0b073aab@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20241002165954.128085-5-wei.huang2@amd.com> References: <20241002165954.128085-1-wei.huang2@amd.com> <20241002165954.128085-5-wei.huang2@amd.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 11:59:53 -0500 Wei Huang wrote: > + if (netif_running(irq->bp->dev)) { > + rtnl_lock(); > + err = netdev_rx_queue_restart(irq->bp->dev, irq->ring_nr); > + if (err) > + netdev_err(irq->bp->dev, > + "rx queue restart failed: err=%d\n", err); > + rtnl_unlock(); > + } > +} > + > +static void __bnxt_irq_affinity_release(struct kref __always_unused *ref) > +{ > +} An empty release function is always a red flag. How is the reference counting used here? Is irq_set_affinity_notifier() not synchronous? Otherwise the rtnl_lock() should probably cover the running check.