From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
almasrymina@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, donald.hunter@gmail.com,
corbet@lwn.net, michael.chan@broadcom.com,
kory.maincent@bootlin.com, andrew@lunn.ch,
maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com, danieller@nvidia.com,
hengqi@linux.alibaba.com, ecree.xilinx@gmail.com,
przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com, hkallweit1@gmail.com,
ahmed.zaki@intel.com, paul.greenwalt@intel.com,
rrameshbabu@nvidia.com, idosch@nvidia.com,
asml.silence@gmail.com, kaiyuanz@google.com, willemb@google.com,
aleksander.lobakin@intel.com, dw@davidwei.uk,
sridhar.samudrala@intel.com, bcreeley@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/7] net: ethtool: add support for configuring tcp-data-split-thresh
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:33:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241008113314.243f7c36@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241003160620.1521626-4-ap420073@gmail.com>
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 16:06:16 +0000 Taehee Yoo wrote:
> The tcp-data-split-thresh option configures the threshold value of
> the tcp-data-split.
> If a received packet size is larger than this threshold value, a packet
> will be split into header and payload.
> The header indicates TCP header, but it depends on driver spec.
> The bnxt_en driver supports HDS(Header-Data-Split) configuration at
> FW level, affecting TCP and UDP too.
> So, like the tcp-data-split option, If tcp-data-split-thresh is set,
> it affects UDP and TCP packets.
>
> The tcp-data-split-thresh has a dependency, that is tcp-data-split
> option. This threshold value can be get/set only when tcp-data-split
> option is enabled.
>
> Example:
> # ethtool -G <interface name> tcp-data-split-thresh <value>
>
> # ethtool -G enp14s0f0np0 tcp-data-split on tcp-data-split-thresh 256
> # ethtool -g enp14s0f0np0
> Ring parameters for enp14s0f0np0:
> Pre-set maximums:
> ...
> TCP data split thresh: 256
> Current hardware settings:
> ...
> TCP data split: on
> TCP data split thresh: 256
>
> The tcp-data-split is not enabled, the tcp-data-split-thresh will
> not be used and can't be configured.
>
> # ethtool -G enp14s0f0np0 tcp-data-split off
> # ethtool -g enp14s0f0np0
> Ring parameters for enp14s0f0np0:
> Pre-set maximums:
> ...
> TCP data split thresh: 256
> Current hardware settings:
> ...
> TCP data split: off
> TCP data split thresh: n/a
My reply to Sridhar was probably quite unclear on this point, but FWIW
I do also have a weak preference to drop the "TCP" from the new knob.
Rephrasing what I said here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240911173150.571bf93b@kernel.org/
the old knob is defined as being about TCP but for the new one we can
pick how widely applicable it is (and make it cover UDP as well).
> The default/min/max values are not defined in the ethtool so the drivers
> should define themself.
> The 0 value means that all TCP and UDP packets' header and payload
> will be split.
> diff --git a/include/linux/ethtool.h b/include/linux/ethtool.h
> index 12f6dc567598..891f55b0f6aa 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ethtool.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ethtool.h
> @@ -78,6 +78,8 @@ enum {
> * @cqe_size: Size of TX/RX completion queue event
> * @tx_push_buf_len: Size of TX push buffer
> * @tx_push_buf_max_len: Maximum allowed size of TX push buffer
> + * @tcp_data_split_thresh: Threshold value of tcp-data-split
> + * @tcp_data_split_thresh_max: Maximum allowed threshold of tcp-data-split-threshold
Please wrap at 80 chars:
./scripts/checkpatch.pl --max-line-length=80 --strict $patch..
> static int rings_fill_reply(struct sk_buff *skb,
> @@ -108,7 +110,13 @@ static int rings_fill_reply(struct sk_buff *skb,
> (nla_put_u32(skb, ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_TX_PUSH_BUF_LEN_MAX,
> kr->tx_push_buf_max_len) ||
> nla_put_u32(skb, ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_TX_PUSH_BUF_LEN,
> - kr->tx_push_buf_len))))
> + kr->tx_push_buf_len))) ||
> + (kr->tcp_data_split == ETHTOOL_TCP_DATA_SPLIT_ENABLED &&
Please add a new ETHTOOL_RING_USE_* flag for this, or fix all the
drivers which set ETHTOOL_RING_USE_TCP_DATA_SPLIT already and use that.
I don't think we should hide the value when HDS is disabled.
> + (nla_put_u32(skb, ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_TCP_DATA_SPLIT_THRESH,
> + kr->tcp_data_split_thresh))) ||
nit: unnecessary brackets around the nla_put_u32()
> + (kr->tcp_data_split == ETHTOOL_TCP_DATA_SPLIT_ENABLED &&
> + (nla_put_u32(skb, ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_TCP_DATA_SPLIT_THRESH_MAX,
> + kr->tcp_data_split_thresh_max))))
> return -EMSGSIZE;
>
> return 0;
> + if (tb[ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_TCP_DATA_SPLIT_THRESH] &&
> + !(ops->supported_ring_params & ETHTOOL_RING_USE_TCP_DATA_SPLIT)) {
here you use the existing flag, yet gve and idpf set that flag and will
ignore the setting silently. They need to be changed or we need a new
flag.
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(info->extack,
> + tb[ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_TCP_DATA_SPLIT_THRESH],
> + "setting tcp-data-split-thresh is not supported");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> if (tb[ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_CQE_SIZE] &&
> !(ops->supported_ring_params & ETHTOOL_RING_USE_CQE_SIZE)) {
> NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(info->extack,
> @@ -196,9 +213,9 @@ ethnl_set_rings(struct ethnl_req_info *req_info, struct genl_info *info)
> struct kernel_ethtool_ringparam kernel_ringparam = {};
> struct ethtool_ringparam ringparam = {};
> struct net_device *dev = req_info->dev;
> + bool mod = false, thresh_mod = false;
> struct nlattr **tb = info->attrs;
> const struct nlattr *err_attr;
> - bool mod = false;
> int ret;
>
> dev->ethtool_ops->get_ringparam(dev, &ringparam,
> @@ -222,9 +239,30 @@ ethnl_set_rings(struct ethnl_req_info *req_info, struct genl_info *info)
> tb[ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_RX_PUSH], &mod);
> ethnl_update_u32(&kernel_ringparam.tx_push_buf_len,
> tb[ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_TX_PUSH_BUF_LEN], &mod);
> - if (!mod)
> + ethnl_update_u32(&kernel_ringparam.tcp_data_split_thresh,
> + tb[ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_TCP_DATA_SPLIT_THRESH],
> + &thresh_mod);
> + if (!mod && !thresh_mod)
> return 0;
>
> + if (kernel_ringparam.tcp_data_split == ETHTOOL_TCP_DATA_SPLIT_DISABLED &&
> + thresh_mod) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(info->extack,
> + tb[ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_TCP_DATA_SPLIT_THRESH],
> + "tcp-data-split-thresh can not be updated while tcp-data-split is disabled");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
I'm not sure we need to reject changing the setting when HDS is
disabled. Driver can just store the value until HDS gets enabled?
WDYT? I don't have a strong preference.
> + if (kernel_ringparam.tcp_data_split_thresh >
> + kernel_ringparam.tcp_data_split_thresh_max) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR_FMT(info->extack,
> + tb[ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_TCP_DATA_SPLIT_THRESH_MAX],
> + "Requested tcp-data-split-thresh exceeds the maximum of %u",
No need for the string, just NL_SET_BAD_ATTR() + ERANGE is enough
> + kernel_ringparam.tcp_data_split_thresh_max);
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
ERANGE
> + }
> +
> /* ensure new ring parameters are within limits */
> if (ringparam.rx_pending > ringparam.rx_max_pending)
> err_attr = tb[ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_RX];
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-08 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-03 16:06 [PATCH net-next v3 0/7] bnxt_en: implement device memory TCP for bnxt Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 16:06 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/7] bnxt_en: add support for rx-copybreak ethtool command Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 16:57 ` Brett Creeley
2024-10-03 17:15 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 17:13 ` Michael Chan
2024-10-03 17:22 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 17:43 ` Michael Chan
2024-10-03 18:28 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 18:34 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-10-05 6:29 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-08 18:10 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-08 19:38 ` Michael Chan
2024-10-08 19:53 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-08 20:35 ` Michael Chan
2024-10-03 16:06 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/7] bnxt_en: add support for tcp-data-split " Taehee Yoo
2024-10-08 18:19 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-09 13:54 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-09 15:28 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-09 17:47 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-31 17:34 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-31 23:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-11-01 17:11 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 16:06 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/7] net: ethtool: add support for configuring tcp-data-split-thresh Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 18:25 ` Mina Almasry
2024-10-03 19:33 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-04 1:47 ` Mina Almasry
2024-10-05 6:11 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-08 18:33 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-10-09 14:25 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-09 15:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-09 17:49 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 16:06 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/7] bnxt_en: add support for tcp-data-split-thresh ethtool command Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 18:13 ` Brett Creeley
2024-10-03 19:13 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-08 18:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-09 14:31 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 16:06 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/7] net: devmem: add ring parameter filtering Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 18:29 ` Mina Almasry
2024-10-04 3:57 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 18:35 ` Brett Creeley
2024-10-03 18:49 ` Mina Almasry
2024-10-08 19:28 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-09 14:35 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-04 4:01 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 16:06 ` [PATCH net-next v3 6/7] net: ethtool: " Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 18:32 ` Mina Almasry
2024-10-03 19:35 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 16:06 ` [PATCH net-next v3 7/7] bnxt_en: add support for device memory tcp Taehee Yoo
2024-10-03 18:43 ` Mina Almasry
2024-10-04 10:34 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-08 2:57 ` David Wei
2024-10-09 15:02 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-08 19:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-09 15:37 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-10 0:01 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-10 17:44 ` Mina Almasry
2024-10-11 1:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-11 17:33 ` Mina Almasry
2024-10-11 23:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-14 22:38 ` Mina Almasry
2024-10-15 0:16 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-15 1:10 ` Mina Almasry
2024-10-15 12:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-18 8:25 ` Mina Almasry
2024-10-19 13:55 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-15 14:29 ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-10-15 17:38 ` David Wei
2024-10-05 3:48 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-08 2:45 ` David Wei
2024-10-08 3:54 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-08 3:58 ` Taehee Yoo
2024-10-16 20:17 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/7] bnxt_en: implement device memory TCP for bnxt Stanislav Fomichev
2024-10-17 8:58 ` Taehee Yoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241008113314.243f7c36@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=ahmed.zaki@intel.com \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=ap420073@gmail.com \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=bcreeley@amd.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=danieller@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
--cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
--cc=ecree.xilinx@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hengqi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kaiyuanz@google.com \
--cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.greenwalt@intel.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=rrameshbabu@nvidia.com \
--cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).