From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 936AB21949D; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:19:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728425976; cv=none; b=E5el1ze4rWwdCdxTV9KMwe1w1YbqtPobguNvwGyfXB7GUFp7PtN6BvTZswze57EiL1yLfBQkGFbnPsANUJOlSoRPva3c7kcXnHBJbbyY18GQN58eI9SkaxvIQcMw2zsb7sI6k9HSY2ApJzMq6bzCp+oInbXHJBQqJLLDfoLgtt0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728425976; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0NlChR/ivl2CuyoQglz7/bGlmFNHi+M/Cmn1JfeCQOo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mN62PMImtWQq0rkz4yiWZi94I50Y0SpWUPG/BpakDcbcLfXciwGIS6TRSxJN433c6aCJ3geIvnOZ6PrMrqzIsjxgo9/h6nKSpufdSuSQ+qO03/2OIx6ib5lOnJ9Yv1ZFZt8xbFjA0Ku2U7dOpjZknZ2hlggMDXHwa05FcwkiFV0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=SnF/swaB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="SnF/swaB" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42D5BC4CEC7; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:19:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1728425976; bh=0NlChR/ivl2CuyoQglz7/bGlmFNHi+M/Cmn1JfeCQOo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=SnF/swaBs+dVW6SqEthJYoxwwwup7zrJUIebMTwFWivbK/q1Uvj6kYrmGPZD4mudc nNDD6pQN8XfVQCbOPtUpNuv3J7halrLe1/9hNQHtKsY3nR8mEhGxBP9YMGI/BQM5OP qdunklKJXlFUWOGvyvll06YwImP84ZbWPoHJgU6HC4+QQsZi8+lGN2eJNUg2uQNI0U RcwD5RScR/ny8ARAxO6FwU3hhp/Fh5KIFunaZvHZe0T6ekRjoYSjYXPU9WuZWp78+R GUHXRmjValfeWaE/mZBj6FaEkCOnfHQDf+VSn3JONd0OWE6PMSccRHBHKYLvFEBR0b /w+IWOrtCvgrQ== Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:19:34 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Joe Damato Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca, skhawaja@google.com, sdf@fomichev.me, bjorn@rivosinc.com, amritha.nambiar@intel.com, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com, willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Donald Hunter , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Mina Almasry , Xuan Zhuo , Daniel Jurgens , open list Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v4 6/9] netdev-genl: Support setting per-NAPI config values Message-ID: <20241008151934.58f124f1@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20241001235302.57609-1-jdamato@fastly.com> <20241001235302.57609-7-jdamato@fastly.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:20:47 -0700 Joe Damato wrote: > Noticed this while re-reading the code; planning on changing this > from NLA_S32 to NLA_U32 for v5. Make sure you edit the spec, not the output. Looks like there may be a problem here (napi-id vs id in the attributes). Make sure you run: ./tools/net/ynl/ynl-regen.sh -f and the tree is clean afterwards