Re: [PATCH net v3 0/6] octeontx2-pf: handle otx2_mbox_get_rsp errors

[Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>]

On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 09:28:18PM +0545, Dipendra Khadka wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> 
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 at 19:05, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 06, 2024 at 04:38:31PM +0000, Dipendra Khadka wrote:
> > > This patch series improves error handling in the Marvell OcteonTX2
> > > NIC driver. Specifically, it adds error pointer checks after
> > > otx2_mbox_get_rsp() to ensure the driver handles error cases more
> > > gracefully.
> > >
> > > Changes in v3:
> > > - Created a patch-set as per the feedback
> > > - Corrected patch subject
> > > - Added error handling in the new files
> > >
> > > Dipendra Khadka (6):
> > >   octeontx2-pf: handle otx2_mbox_get_rsp errors in otx2_common.c
> > >   octeontx2-pf: handle otx2_mbox_get_rsp errors in otx2_ethtool.c
> > >   octeontx2-pf: handle otx2_mbox_get_rsp errors in otx2_flows.c
> > >   octeontx2-pf: handle otx2_mbox_get_rsp errors in cn10k.c
> > >   octeontx2-pf: handle otx2_mbox_get_rsp errors in otx2_dmac_flt.c
> > >   octeontx2-pf: handle otx2_mbox_get_rsp errors in otx2_dcbnl.c
> > >
> > >  drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/cn10k.c   |  5 +++++
> > >  .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.c |  4 ++++
> > >  .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_dcbnl.c  |  5 +++++
> > >  .../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_dmac_flt.c   |  9 +++++++++
> > >  .../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_ethtool.c    | 10 ++++++++++
> > >  .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_flows.c  | 12 ++++++++++++
> > >  6 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
> >
> > Thanks for bundling this up in a patch-set.
> >
> > For reference, it does seem that the threading of this patchset is broken.
> > Perhaps there was some option you passed to git send-email that caused
> > this. In any case, please look into this for future submissions.
> >
> > Also, please use ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl patch_file to generate
> > the CC list for patches.
> >
> > Lastly, b4 can help with both of the above.
> 
> Sure, thanks for this.
> Do I have to send all the patches again with v4 with the new changes
> to the few patches and the same old unchanged patches?

Please send all the patches when you send a new version.