From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
davem@davemloft.net, kadlec@netfilter.org, pablo@netfilter.org,
rgb@redhat.com, paul@paul-moore.com, upstream+net@sigma-star.at
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: Record uid and gid in xt_AUDIT
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 23:33:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241009213345.GC3714@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241009203218.26329-1-richard@nod.at>
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> wrote:
> When recording audit events for new outgoing connections,
> it is helpful to log the user info of the associated socket,
> if available.
> Therefore, check if the skb has a socket, and if it does,
> log the owning fsuid/fsgid.
AFAIK audit isn't namespace aware at all (neither netns nor userns), so I
wonder how to handle this.
We can't reject adding a -j AUDIT rule for non-init-net (we could, but I'm sure
it'll break some setups...).
But I wonder if we should at least skip the uid if the user namespace is
'something else'.
> + if (sk && sk_fullsock(sk)) {
I.e. check net->user_ns == &init_user_ns too and don't log the uid
otherwise.
I don't think auditd can make sense of the uid otherwise, resp.
its misleading, no?
Alternatively, use this instead?
kuid = sock_net_uid(sock_net(sk), sk);
from_kuid_munged(sock_net(sk)->user_ns, kuid);
There is no need to follow ->file backpointer anymore, see
6acc5c2910689fc6ee181bf63085c5efff6a42bd and
86741ec25462e4c8cdce6df2f41ead05568c7d5e,
"net: core: Add a UID field to struct sock.".
I think we could streamline all the existing paths that fetch uid
from sock->file to not do that and use sock_net_uid() instead as well.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-09 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-09 20:32 [PATCH] netfilter: Record uid and gid in xt_AUDIT Richard Weinberger
2024-10-09 21:33 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2024-10-09 21:46 ` Paul Moore
2024-10-09 22:34 ` Florian Westphal
2024-10-10 2:02 ` Paul Moore
2024-10-10 17:59 ` Florian Westphal
2024-10-10 19:13 ` Paul Moore
2024-10-10 6:27 ` Richard Weinberger
2024-10-10 13:48 ` Florian Westphal
2024-10-10 13:53 ` Jan Engelhardt
2024-10-10 20:09 ` Richard Weinberger
2024-10-11 1:27 ` Florian Westphal
2024-10-11 13:12 ` Richard Weinberger
2024-10-09 22:02 ` Paul Moore
2024-10-10 6:24 ` Richard Weinberger
2024-10-10 19:09 ` Paul Moore
2024-10-10 20:40 ` Richard Weinberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241009213345.GC3714@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=upstream+net@sigma-star.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).