netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca,
	skhawaja@google.com, sdf@fomichev.me, bjorn@rivosinc.com,
	amritha.nambiar@intel.com, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com,
	willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com,
	Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
	Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>,
	Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next v5 6/9] netdev-genl: Support setting per-NAPI config values
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 08:19:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241010081923.7714b268@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iJ1=xA9WGhXAMcCAeacE3pYgqiWjcBdxiWjGPACP-5n_g@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 06:24:54 +0200 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > +static const struct netlink_range_validation netdev_a_napi_defer_hard_irqs_range = {
> > +       .max    = 2147483647ULL,  
> 
> Would (u64)INT_MAX  work ?

I sent a codegen change for this. The codegen is a bit of a mess.

> > +int netdev_nl_napi_set_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> > +{
> > +       struct napi_struct *napi;
> > +       unsigned int napi_id;
> > +       int err;
> > +
> > +       if (GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, NETDEV_A_NAPI_ID))
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +       napi_id = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[NETDEV_A_NAPI_ID]);
> > +
> > +       rtnl_lock();  
> 
> Hmm.... please see my patch there :
> 
>  https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20241009232728.107604-2-edumazet@google.com/
> 
> Lets not add another rtnl_lock() :/

It's not as easy since NAPIs can come and go at driver's whim.
I'm quietly hoping we can convert all netdev-nl NAPI accesses
to use the netdev->lock protection I strong-armed Paolo into 
adding in his shaper series. But perhaps we can do that after
this series? NAPI GET already takes RTNL lock.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-10 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-09  0:54 [net-next v5 0/9] Add support for per-NAPI config via netlink Joe Damato
2024-10-09  0:54 ` [net-next v5 1/9] net: napi: Make napi_defer_hard_irqs per-NAPI Joe Damato
2024-10-10  4:10   ` Eric Dumazet
2024-10-09  0:54 ` [net-next v5 2/9] netdev-genl: Dump napi_defer_hard_irqs Joe Damato
2024-10-10  4:11   ` Eric Dumazet
2024-10-09  0:54 ` [net-next v5 3/9] net: napi: Make gro_flush_timeout per-NAPI Joe Damato
2024-10-10  4:13   ` Eric Dumazet
2024-10-09  0:54 ` [net-next v5 4/9] netdev-genl: Dump gro_flush_timeout Joe Damato
2024-10-10  3:14   ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-10  4:34     ` Joe Damato
2024-10-10  4:45       ` Eric Dumazet
2024-10-10  4:59         ` Joe Damato
2024-10-09  0:54 ` [net-next v5 5/9] net: napi: Add napi_config Joe Damato
2024-10-10  4:20   ` Eric Dumazet
2024-10-10 15:59     ` Joe Damato
2024-10-10 16:08       ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-09  0:55 ` [net-next v5 6/9] netdev-genl: Support setting per-NAPI config values Joe Damato
2024-10-10  4:24   ` Eric Dumazet
2024-10-10 15:19     ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-10-10 15:30       ` Eric Dumazet
2024-10-10 16:40         ` Joe Damato
2024-10-11 17:19           ` Eric Dumazet
2024-10-11 17:50             ` Joe Damato
2024-10-09  0:55 ` [net-next v5 7/9] bnxt: Add support for persistent NAPI config Joe Damato
2024-10-10  4:25   ` Eric Dumazet
2024-10-09  0:55 ` [net-next v5 8/9] mlx5: " Joe Damato
2024-10-10  4:26   ` Eric Dumazet
2024-10-09  0:55 ` [net-next v5 9/9] mlx4: Add support for persistent NAPI config to RX CQs Joe Damato
2024-10-10  4:28   ` Eric Dumazet
2024-10-10 16:07     ` Joe Damato
2024-10-10  3:17 ` [net-next v5 0/9] Add support for per-NAPI config via netlink Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241010081923.7714b268@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=almasrymina@google.com \
    --cc=amritha.nambiar@intel.com \
    --cc=bjorn@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkarsten@uwaterloo.ca \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=skhawaja@google.com \
    --cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).