From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
To: <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <kuni1840@gmail.com>,
<kuniyu@amazon.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 13/13] rtnetlink: Protect struct rtnl_af_ops with SRCU.
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 09:27:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241010162715.62120-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iJUX3nkQJDOTsj9RN0dH4_u=mVQd4Z9m_mMCLm60Eppug@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 15:16:20 +0200
> > @@ -683,6 +696,7 @@ static const struct rtnl_af_ops *rtnl_af_lookup(const int family)
> > void rtnl_af_register(struct rtnl_af_ops *ops)
> > {
> > rtnl_lock();
> > + init_srcu_struct(&ops->srcu);
>
> Same remark, this could fail.
This requries rtnl_af_register() to return int, and that needs
few more changes conflicting with rtnl_register_many() changes.
I'll see if it'd be a bit noisy, and if so, I'll split this patch
to another series.
Thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-10 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-09 23:16 [PATCH v1 net-next 00/13] rtnetlink: Refactor rtnl_{new,del,set}link() for per-netns RTNL Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-09 23:16 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 01/13] rtnetlink: Allocate linkinfo[] as struct rtnl_newlink_tbs Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-10 12:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-10-09 23:16 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 02/13] rtnetlink: Call validate_linkmsg() in do_setlink() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-10 12:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-10-09 23:16 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 03/13] rtnetlink: Factorise do_setlink() path from __rtnl_newlink() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-10 12:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-10-09 23:16 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 04/13] rtnetlink: Move simple validation from __rtnl_newlink() to rtnl_newlink() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-10 12:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-10-09 23:16 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 05/13] rtnetlink: Move rtnl_link_ops_get() and retry " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-09 23:16 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 06/13] rtnetlink: Move ops->validate " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-10 12:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-10-09 23:16 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 07/13] rtnetlink: Protect struct rtnl_link_ops with SRCU Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-10 13:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-10-10 16:20 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-09 23:16 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 08/13] rtnetlink: Call rtnl_link_get_net_capable() in rtnl_newlink() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-10 13:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-10-09 23:16 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 09/13] rtnetlink: Fetch IFLA_LINK_NETNSID " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-10 13:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-10-09 23:16 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 10/13] rtnetlink: Clean up rtnl_dellink() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-10 13:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-10-09 23:16 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 11/13] rtnetlink: Clean up rtnl_setlink() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-10 13:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-10-09 23:16 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 12/13] rtnetlink: Call rtnl_link_get_net_capable() in do_setlink() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-10 13:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-10-11 7:36 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-11 16:17 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-09 23:16 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 13/13] rtnetlink: Protect struct rtnl_af_ops with SRCU Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-10 13:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-10-10 16:27 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241010162715.62120-1-kuniyu@amazon.com \
--to=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).