From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: Realtek linux nic maintainers <nic_swsd@realtek.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] r8169: use the extended tally counter available from RTL8125
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 10:55:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241011095522.GE66815@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30edd5d2-13aa-409f-9b12-f0c775c81f02@gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 10:08:02PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 10.10.2024 12:50, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> > The new hw stat fields partially duplicate existing fields, but with a
> > larger field size now. Use these new fields to reduce the risk of
> > overflows. In addition add support for relevant new fields which are
> > available from RTL8125 only.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
...
> > @@ -1873,13 +1888,33 @@ static void rtl8169_get_ethtool_stats(struct net_device *dev,
> > data[10] = le32_to_cpu(counters->rx_multicast);
> > data[11] = le16_to_cpu(counters->tx_aborted);
> > data[12] = le16_to_cpu(counters->tx_underrun);
> > +
> > + if (rtl_is_8125(tp)) {
> > + data[5] = le32_to_cpu(counters->align_errors32);
> > + data[10] = le64_to_cpu(counters->rx_multicast64);
> > + data[11] = le32_to_cpu(counters->tx_aborted32);
> > + data[12] = le32_to_cpu(counters->tx_underrun32);
> > +
> > + data[13] = le64_to_cpu(counters->tx_octets);
> > + data[14] = le64_to_cpu(counters->rx_octets);
> > + data[15] = le32_to_cpu(counters->tx_pause_on);
> > + data[16] = le32_to_cpu(counters->tx_pause_off);
> > + data[17] = le32_to_cpu(counters->rx_pause_on);
> > + data[18] = le32_to_cpu(counters->rx_pause_off);
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > static void rtl8169_get_strings(struct net_device *dev, u32 stringset, u8 *data)
> > {
> > switch(stringset) {
> > case ETH_SS_STATS:
> > + struct rtl8169_private *tp = netdev_priv(dev);
>
> patchwork lists the following warning for a clang build:
> warning: label followed by a declaration is a C23 extension [-Wc23-extensions]
>
> gcc 14.2.1 however had no problem with this code, and also checkpatch didn't
> complain. Is this code acceptable or should it be changed?
Yes, I see that too.
My feeling is that it would be best to change it as it
seems likely that this will break compilation somewhere.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-11 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-10 10:50 [PATCH net-next v2] r8169: use the extended tally counter available from RTL8125 Heiner Kallweit
2024-10-10 20:08 ` Heiner Kallweit
2024-10-11 9:55 ` Simon Horman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241011095522.GE66815@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nic_swsd@realtek.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).