From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Wang Hai <wanghai38@huawei.com>
Cc: ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com, sriharsha.basavapatna@broadcom.com,
somnath.kotur@broadcom.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
VenkatKumar.Duvvuru@emulex.com, zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] be2net: fix potential memory leak in be_xmit()
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:40:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241015074025.GB569285@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241014144758.42010-1-wanghai38@huawei.com>
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 10:47:58PM +0800, Wang Hai wrote:
> The be_xmit() returns NETDEV_TX_OK without freeing skb
> in case of be_xmit_enqueue() fails, add dev_kfree_skb_any() to fix it.
>
> Fixes: 760c295e0e8d ("be2net: Support for OS2BMC.")
> Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@huawei.com>
Thanks,
I agree that this is correct an din keeping with other
drop handling within this function.
I do, however, wonder if this logic could be expressed both
more clearly and idiomatically like this (completely untested!):
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c
index a8596ebcdfd6..d171acb6544f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c
@@ -1381,10 +1381,8 @@ static netdev_tx_t be_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev)
be_get_wrb_params_from_skb(adapter, skb, &wrb_params);
wrb_cnt = be_xmit_enqueue(adapter, txo, skb, &wrb_params);
- if (unlikely(!wrb_cnt)) {
- dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
- goto drop;
- }
+ if (unlikely(!wrb_cnt))
+ goto drop_skb;
/* if os2bmc is enabled and if the pkt is destined to bmc,
* enqueue the pkt a 2nd time with mgmt bit set.
@@ -1393,7 +1391,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t be_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev)
BE_WRB_F_SET(wrb_params.features, OS2BMC, 1);
wrb_cnt = be_xmit_enqueue(adapter, txo, skb, &wrb_params);
if (unlikely(!wrb_cnt))
- goto drop;
+ goto drop_skb;
else
skb_get(skb);
}
@@ -1407,6 +1405,9 @@ static netdev_tx_t be_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev)
be_xmit_flush(adapter, txo);
return NETDEV_TX_OK;
+
+drop_skb:
+ dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
drop:
tx_stats(txo)->tx_drv_drops++;
/* Flush the already enqueued tx requests */
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-15 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-14 14:47 [PATCH net] be2net: fix potential memory leak in be_xmit() Wang Hai
2024-10-15 7:40 ` Simon Horman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241015074025.GB569285@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=VenkatKumar.Duvvuru@emulex.com \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=somnath.kotur@broadcom.com \
--cc=sriharsha.basavapatna@broadcom.com \
--cc=wanghai38@huawei.com \
--cc=zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).