netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
	Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
	cjubran@nvidia.com, cratiu@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 09/15] net/mlx5: Remove vport QoS enabled flag
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 12:04:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241015110407.GD569285@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241014205300.193519-10-tariqt@nvidia.com>

On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 11:52:54PM +0300, Tariq Toukan wrote:
> From: Carolina Jubran <cjubran@nvidia.com>
> 
> Remove the `enabled` flag from the `vport->qos` struct, as QoS now
> relies solely on the `sched_node` pointer to determine whether QoS
> features are in use.
> 
> Currently, the vport `qos` struct consists only of the `sched_node`,
> introducing an unnecessary two-level reference. However, the qos struct
> is retained as it will be extended in future patches to support new QoS
> features.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Carolina Jubran <cjubran@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/esw/qos.c | 13 ++++++-------
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h |  2 --
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/esw/qos.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/esw/qos.c

...

> @@ -933,7 +932,7 @@ int mlx5_esw_qos_modify_vport_rate(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, u16 vport_num, u32
>  	}
>  
>  	esw_qos_lock(esw);
> -	if (!vport->qos.enabled) {
> +	if (!vport->qos.sched_node) {
>  		/* Eswitch QoS wasn't enabled yet. Enable it and vport QoS. */
>  		err = esw_qos_vport_enable(vport, rate_mbps, vport->qos.sched_node->bw_share, NULL);

Sorry, another nit from my side:

If we get here then vport->qos.sched_node is NULL,
but it is dereferenced on the line above.

Flagged by Smatch.

>  	} else {

...

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-15 11:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-14 20:52 [PATCH net-next V2 00/15] net/mlx5: Refactor esw QoS to support generalized operations Tariq Toukan
2024-10-14 20:52 ` [PATCH net-next V2 01/15] net/mlx5: Refactor QoS group scheduling element creation Tariq Toukan
2024-10-14 20:52 ` [PATCH net-next V2 02/15] net/mlx5: Introduce node type to rate group structure Tariq Toukan
2024-10-14 20:52 ` [PATCH net-next V2 03/15] net/mlx5: Add parent group support in " Tariq Toukan
2024-10-14 20:52 ` [PATCH net-next V2 04/15] net/mlx5: Restrict domain list insertion to root TSAR ancestors Tariq Toukan
2024-10-14 20:52 ` [PATCH net-next V2 05/15] net/mlx5: Rename vport QoS group reference to parent Tariq Toukan
2024-10-14 20:52 ` [PATCH net-next V2 06/15] net/mlx5: Introduce node struct and rename group terminology to node Tariq Toukan
2024-10-14 20:52 ` [PATCH net-next V2 07/15] net/mlx5: Refactor vport scheduling element creation function Tariq Toukan
2024-10-14 20:52 ` [PATCH net-next V2 08/15] net/mlx5: Refactor vport QoS to use scheduling node structure Tariq Toukan
2024-10-14 20:52 ` [PATCH net-next V2 09/15] net/mlx5: Remove vport QoS enabled flag Tariq Toukan
2024-10-15 11:04   ` Simon Horman [this message]
2024-10-15 11:26     ` Tariq Toukan
2024-10-14 20:52 ` [PATCH net-next V2 10/15] net/mlx5: Simplify QoS scheduling element configuration Tariq Toukan
2024-10-14 20:52 ` [PATCH net-next V2 11/15] net/mlx5: Generalize QoS operations for nodes and vports Tariq Toukan
2024-10-14 20:52 ` [PATCH net-next V2 12/15] net/mlx5: Add sync reset drop mode support Tariq Toukan
2024-10-14 20:52 ` [PATCH net-next V2 13/15] net/mlx5: Only create VEPA flow table when in VEPA mode Tariq Toukan
2024-10-14 20:52 ` [PATCH net-next V2 14/15] net/mlx5: fs, rename packet reformat struct member action Tariq Toukan
2024-10-14 20:53 ` [PATCH net-next V2 15/15] net/mlx5: fs, rename modify header " Tariq Toukan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241015110407.GD569285@kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=cjubran@nvidia.com \
    --cc=cratiu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gal@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).