From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A38519C542; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 23:22:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729034549; cv=none; b=mwupl2wlXaw3yBfafcoEmkkymwih+pIbrnxjb8rP3zWMDV630wawbbXT8i39nJ8drfVo5YT62PEwQdH0I9eI1sfz7c/70C+16A+XkoKe3exIj87nPUHyar7Cpo1RpdcgpHpeJFusTy8XNl8J+wyo2bjaPhHTSd6qEOnTAfQXI64= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729034549; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SZbokGXMJZ3coHJvqdScXDpyPhe0Y00MZjJqgrpRdPs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BDz4jMiq/q/el6vETfCBqi49LDVfBvEyhiBg+aW+tiXh7Q+tp4jVR8DytX5jYdC2tLn3e6/+R4ObpPrWJ39us/ap+v9VPW8KFpZd+fNTeRyzpqf8krClaBmDHZOrxq2zfhSRSi4qKHEn70m9Gs0OcPNGfr1XpZ2zqkZtZXtF9G4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=MCavwmTh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="MCavwmTh" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE0F3C4CEC6; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 23:22:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1729034549; bh=SZbokGXMJZ3coHJvqdScXDpyPhe0Y00MZjJqgrpRdPs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MCavwmThkKLRCH1gx9a9O0fFGORP/RNa+Dv9/0uvpZkeiuCXPVI+M9vzStMaV8jLK D+dc33UWSljwE/fv6MKsEdjawDnxveO7My8XzRmVn5nr3DtGE3zpZzuIOeSX7A3pFG iPyiNW0j3kOws/JWEjZwo+b/1PkI0g/jSNFWCzQVfKFLGglTLQQ1xtenTSDph9cFnY AZz3mWaFyBoMAwNPi+eZd4oe/S5NfKfE4AxNM/B3EQQ6RS76QFIffgO03DA9c5TvuM YaS9OrzjlmpVOnbGXkG8+ySVGvrppcUvbu1wfrFxUm7VvaPlvz4YFwoZhK90aiKm4N YzR9HO48LPNPg== Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 16:22:27 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Jinjie Ruan , bryan.whitehead@microchip.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, anna-maria@linutronix.de, frederic@kernel.org, richardcochran@gmail.com, johnstul@us.ibm.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, jstultz@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 RESEND 1/2] posix-clock: Fix missing timespec64 check in pc_clock_settime() Message-ID: <20241015162227.4265d7b2@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <87v7xtc7z5.ffs@tglx> References: <20241009072302.1754567-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> <20241009072302.1754567-2-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> <20241011125726.62c5dde7@kernel.org> <87v7xtc7z5.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:33:02 +0200 Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > I'm guessing we can push this into 6.12-rc and the other patch into > > net-next. I'll toss it into net on Monday unless someone objects. > > Can you folks please at least wait until the maintainers of the code in > question had a look ? You are literally quoting the text where I say I will wait 3 more days. Unfortunately "until the maintainers respond" leads to waiting forever 50% of the time, and even when we cap at 3 working days we have 300 patches in the queue (292 right now, and I already spent 2 hours reviewing today). Hope you understand. Sorry if we applied too early, please review, I'll revert if it's no good.