From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BA3814B088; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 07:32:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729582352; cv=none; b=LQJHDFndNnGKghzJIY5rE3tORLO2v7ropSje38heTTAU1qaHh1I7vQv4djNgAjS6ndP2y8TFf8ya6bklNEs7GONkPGPGO1kI8mXCfXPJIy6uzSAOqMQm2/ZHPwjM7XNp8fV6RytX+TFSuvTDKHeq00CbVPIgknVc9chxjTFvyHo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729582352; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KPwac6l+2tUtMD2vs4OOQYjiSpu5Fyksb4QT8Letd7M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=rGhJ3YF14GAHxhh7u2+G+DYjCZz0Xf4Nf8O8C56PJ/jVi4N0xJBUIT1kDQBeMtKluiDa88Ns54wjv3EUeFmue678Kyj/RvEwzqvN+iZ2abwc2K48C/BvNEenzdWvy1wwyRayhbL2Mn4TJpimvTevBvm1Zuh0PwDYI0AvfrfcrQE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=rVfp3th2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="rVfp3th2" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 23B53C4CEE4; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 07:32:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1729582352; bh=KPwac6l+2tUtMD2vs4OOQYjiSpu5Fyksb4QT8Letd7M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=rVfp3th2asmEs1VDi+Jim8+lR++xFADU+Psocn9CuEgAduqY6GvxVNMmxO36SIfhZ UNs25XfBW7YVmeZV8sKvwMJ7XT6PeEkUF97iIdc3pvd//oqQ8O8k6qISB1y7gFHQFI nkubjcuMtn8Ip/NQG/8pGwZsPCZ+b8Vlbv6mB/cOzhN0uN7G+auRQ2eDOOzbp4xzMI kldfoB6SbR+QaKtCHEotTUzD0Ky6XyuTA/0KFpf2/txPy+3IOvfFh6Njxa5A6xb/0t t0qBLZ4ZMPE9k7c2ZjN5hIuLF5Blk3V5omeLCxzbjwFDIHcabo11m3/PWSXnVy3X1h 0edHIR25rvMIQ== Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:32:25 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: Yue Haibing Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com, vedang.patel@intel.com, jithu.joseph@intel.com, andre.guedes@intel.com, jacob.e.keller@intel.com, sven.auhagen@voleatech.de, alexander.h.duyck@intel.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net 0/4] Fix passing 0 to ERR_PTR in intel ether drivers Message-ID: <20241022073225.GO402847@kernel.org> References: <20241022065623.1282224-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241022065623.1282224-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 02:56:19PM +0800, Yue Haibing wrote: > Fixing sparse error in xdp run code by introducing new variable xdp_res > instead of overloading this into the skb pointer as i40e drivers done > in commit 12738ac4754e ("i40e: Fix sparse errors in i40e_txrx.c") and > commit ae4393dfd472 ("i40e: fix broken XDP support"). > > v3: Fix uninitialized 'xdp_res' in patch 3 and 4 which Reported-by > kernel test robot > v2: Fix this as i40e drivers done instead of return NULL in xdp run code Hi Yue Haibing, all, I like these changes a lot. But I do wonder if it would be more appropriate to target them at net-next (or iwl-next) rather than net, without Fixes tags. This is because they don't seem to be fixing (user-visible) bugs. Am I missing something? ...