From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A765619E99E; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 12:19:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729685971; cv=none; b=V9yIdljXUQMdE30urXapaPZcwHCT99+ZqZ8+18YxyGt1vaAk+ZoL0gwqXv9aQy4RnAgorFhUChuOF7wXDN8NyCKJGZTHduT4nkyJ5+4Hz1+whGA4pbI9MJ6ubiXslJkAm2UAwgiJMwQqE3L7co3NvPswXnrxNe/jwRDourXI/Ps= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729685971; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Nel0teWPYV2DMRNkXDa1Z7k3Fl+vQmZbSDgEzb3yCgA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=awzo0ygOZ/sU85dmfoZbP+sOoTFDHdRx0ACXl1lunfysdf02picpbnHsDnbxBMd8DN79tRmg7y1LrVtdXUYH8hm2h5ZeAuI+fB4xzVb1EkXtlT9HSQT4obMR0EFAwc6MZzdEGwIabnVbPtFL+wnBIkgPV9pBzCd/DV6atghUw2w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=aDCbbNn/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="aDCbbNn/" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 857D2C4CEC6; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 12:19:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1729685971; bh=Nel0teWPYV2DMRNkXDa1Z7k3Fl+vQmZbSDgEzb3yCgA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=aDCbbNn/kjW1k/LhjKlIjA++Na4cYYO4NvKJNHR9kQyafDU00+2yvsKUEsgFpoFFS E/CFZW5Tsq/ZsfSgWqLYnOcdrF0iMbKvEhbZA1B0hERNF4q46xLkKd4+IUhtCiyQOq WjRwl2676HBq7eOCgQxVdlWBH1UXObsg1jkAuHt6fHLjPFUMU22DzZtAjR56x+0rmj QwTnHqSVZhbI86S2NQgBbUZUFL//Ha50SAcCW/y0GCAKExUVbzFIzOWHqYkS941Gp2 DzjP8EwL8eP3eHgDlaj2cfFsVLTx3uLhRDleZ0lzdC1GcpwFmh2CvyoAH0b7rtoB97 h9+3CYG8MwSWA== Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 13:19:26 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" Cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev, Mat Martineau , Geliang Tang , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Gregory Detal , Shuah Khan , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/3] selftests: mptcp: list sysctl data Message-ID: <20241023121926.GR402847@kernel.org> References: <20241021-net-mptcp-sched-lock-v1-0-637759cf061c@kernel.org> <20241021-net-mptcp-sched-lock-v1-3-637759cf061c@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241021-net-mptcp-sched-lock-v1-3-637759cf061c@kernel.org> On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 12:25:28PM +0200, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote: > Listing all the values linked to the MPTCP sysctl knobs was not > exercised in MPTCP test suite. > > Let's do that to avoid any regressions, but also to have a kernel with a > debug kconfig verifying more assumptions. For the moment, we are not > interested by the output, only to avoid crashes and warnings. > > Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) I am assuming that we are ok with expanding test coverage via net, which FWIIW, does seem reasonable to me. Reviewed-by: Simon Horman ...