From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 225E01F8EFA; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 14:22:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.195 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729779762; cv=none; b=pEZ9oinEytak6d3vMuCPkFZgMtJcc93CdDaSV8ZL81WSRlrsMehq7FVUFNO6cTajVbW0rTUECqBcS8NtrOUBdSNX5bscly8EK7dhnoGSwW2XtMQyfz0MladgcS85Ws1ZvlDhbM4ZXbSQvkyP3Ibz07D2jPDhzVOwpFviYmQHw4I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729779762; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lPV1yWvlooeisusKmZKwVckn9G3uzeBODmUCjqE3y/c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NycfzTvfzAIJEc3U+BlmUNVibsxdpAxPYkHNUgDi9bf71zydEqvU/vSl898hFSzKjb9/e7mV3g3pPIHA7yTTvFGH6IyLzXb7Fp8f8SsBvpdNoHZQIFNAsvNtiRwTxSlVHapZN/EzrBGKcDzyqylW6sPNzLFlu4fNcf6ic5ZizlI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=FWAJDsxh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.195 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="FWAJDsxh" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BBB486000F; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 14:22:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1729779756; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=lPV1yWvlooeisusKmZKwVckn9G3uzeBODmUCjqE3y/c=; b=FWAJDsxh66/UfoSazI4jZ2q2PFuwZtTV6l595EnpO+Bz+h90+T+7iHwFcTVnkMwqBcPtaI sJ0BL0TysiJTOIvkMTe+Oj1dnACdlz/JMCCN++3ZTOhYGcDWZiOLoj48lmJ1wzwNPXfCv0 aeB49U7aVx6b76Novs+sDq0jmQEHvXffhyXidluPMf2jrdJ3UhB7hmLsmUezVmGNoGO5qv CixrWRvKV6GbxNrhGU7YL4qtnFk1ohNocH7oQ94CNx2CTLInNbfS/sa2yQY2DqhRZuNiZe nn3Ww57lZiHFD8xhn9zHuJJiuuFTe1uq9z1CofVBpWDKutDLU3YNxrTvHUUKHQ== Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:22:32 +0200 From: Kory Maincent To: Vladimir Oltean Cc: Florian Fainelli , Broadcom internal kernel review list , Andrew Lunn , Heiner Kallweit , Russell King , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Richard Cochran , Radu Pirea , Jay Vosburgh , Andy Gospodarek , Nicolas Ferre , Claudiu Beznea , Willem de Bruijn , Jonathan Corbet , Horatiu Vultur , UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Simon Horman , donald.hunter@gmail.com, danieller@nvidia.com, ecree.xilinx@gmail.com, Andrew Lunn , Thomas Petazzoni , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Chevallier , Rahul Rameshbabu , Willem de Bruijn , Shannon Nelson , Alexandra Winter , Jacob Keller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v18 00/10] net: Make timestamping selectable Message-ID: <20241024162232.038be0ac@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390> In-Reply-To: <20241024140422.3okn5lfqu72ncbxa@skbuf> References: <20241023-feature_ptp_netnext-v18-0-ed948f3b6887@bootlin.com> <20241024140422.3okn5lfqu72ncbxa@skbuf> Organization: bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-GND-Sasl: kory.maincent@bootlin.com On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 17:04:22 +0300 Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 05:49:10PM +0200, Kory Maincent wrote: > > The series is based on the following netlink spec and documentation pat= ches: > > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241022151418.875424-1-kory.maincent@bo= otlin.com/ > > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241023141559.100973-1-kory.maincent@bo= otlin.com/ > > =20 >=20 > No point in posting a non-RFC patch revision if it conflicts with unmerged > dependencies. Since it doesn't apply cleanly, the NIPA CI won't run on it > and it won't be a candidate for merging due to that. But, if you post as > RFC PATCH v18 instead, you make it crystal clear for the reviewers involv= ed > that you only request feedback. I naively thought net maintainers could rerun the CI after these patch get merged. I will need to repost a v19 later then. Sorry for the noise. Regards, --=20 K=C3=B6ry Maincent, Bootlin Embedded Linux and kernel engineering https://bootlin.com