From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
To: <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
Cc: <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, <anna@kernel.org>, <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
<edumazet@google.com>, <jlayton@kernel.org>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
<kuniyu@amazon.com>, <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
<liujian56@huawei.com>, <neilb@suse.de>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<okorniev@redhat.com>, <pabeni@redhat.com>, <tom@talpey.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sunrpc: fix one UAF issue caused by sunrpc kernel tcp socket
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 17:48:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241026004837.57278-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0e434c61120b5b4a530731260c0f2c72ad02fa6f.camel@hammerspace.com>
From: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 00:35:30 +0000
> On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 14:20 -0700, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > From: "liujian (CE)" <liujian56@huawei.com>
> > Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 11:32:52 +0800
> > > > > > If not, then what prevents it from happening?
> > > > > The socket created by the userspace program obtains the
> > > > > reference
> > > > > counting of the namespace, but the kernel socket does not.
> > > > >
> > > > > There's some discussion here:
> > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CANn89iJE5anTbyLJ0TdGAqGsE+GichY3YzQECjNUVMz=G3bcQg@mail.gmail.com/
> > > > OK... So then it looks to me as if NFS, SMB, AFS, and any other
> > > > networked filesystem that can be started from inside a container
> > > > is
> > > > going to need to do the same thing that rds appears to be doing.
> >
> > FWIW, recently we saw a similar UAF on CIFS.
> >
> >
> > > >
> > > > Should there perhaps be a helper function in the networking layer
> > > > for
> > > > this?
> > >
> > > There should be no such helper function at present, right?.
> > >
> > > If get net's reference to fix this problem, the following test is
> > > performed. There's nothing wrong with this case. I don't know if
> > > there's
> > > anything else to consider.
> > >
> > > I don't have any other ideas other than these two methods. Do you
> > > have
> > > any suggestions on this problem? @Eric @Jakub ... @All
> >
> > The netns lifetime should be managed by the upper layer rather than
> > the networking layer. If the netns is already dead, the upper layer
> > must discard the net pointer anyway.
> >
> > I suggest checking maybe_get_net() in NFS, CIFS, etc and then calling
> > __sock_create() with kern 0.
> >
>
> Thanks for the suggestion, but we already manage the netns lifetime in
> the RPC layer. A reference is taken when the filesystem is being
> mounted. It is dropped when the filesystem is being unmounted.
>
> The problem is the TCP timer races on shutdown. There is no interest in
> having to manage that in the RPC layer.
Does that mean netns is always alive when the socket is created
in svc_create_socket() or xs_create_sock() ? If so, you can just
use __sock_create(kern=0) there to prevent net from being freed
before the socket.
sock_create_kern() and kern@ are confusing, and we had similar issues
in other kernel TCP socket users SMC/RDS, so I'll rename them to
sock_create_noref() and no_net_ref@ or something.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-26 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-24 1:55 [PATCH net] sunrpc: fix one UAF issue caused by sunrpc kernel tcp socket Liu Jian
2024-10-24 2:20 ` Trond Myklebust
2024-10-24 12:57 ` Trond Myklebust
2024-10-24 13:40 ` liujian (CE)
2024-10-24 13:57 ` Trond Myklebust
2024-10-25 3:32 ` liujian (CE)
2024-10-25 21:20 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-10-26 0:35 ` Trond Myklebust
2024-10-26 0:48 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2024-10-26 1:31 ` liujian (CE)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241026004837.57278-1-kuniyu@amazon.com \
--to=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liujian56@huawei.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
--cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox