netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Tony Lu <tonylu@linux.alibaba.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Jan Karcher <jaka@linux.ibm.com>,
	Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Nils Hoppmann <niho@linux.ibm.com>,
	Niklas Schnell <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>,
	Thorsten Winkler <twinkler@linux.ibm.com>,
	Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>,
	Stefan Raspl <raspl@linux.ibm.com>, Aswin K <aswin@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/smc: Fix lookup of netdev by using ib_device_get_netdev()
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 22:18:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241027201857.GA1615717@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241025072356.56093-1-wenjia@linux.ibm.com>

On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 09:23:55AM +0200, Wenjia Zhang wrote:
> Commit c2261dd76b54 ("RDMA/device: Add ib_device_set_netdev() as an
> alternative to get_netdev") introduced an API ib_device_get_netdev.
> The SMC-R variant of the SMC protocol continued to use the old API
> ib_device_ops.get_netdev() to lookup netdev. 

I would say that calls to ibdev ops from ULPs was never been right
thing to do. The ib_device_set_netdev() was introduced for the drivers.

So the whole commit message is not accurate and better to be rewritten.

> As this commit 8d159eb2117b
> ("RDMA/mlx5: Use IB set_netdev and get_netdev functions") removed the
> get_netdev callback from mlx5_ib_dev_common_roce_ops, calling
> ib_device_ops.get_netdev didn't work any more at least by using a mlx5
> device driver.

It is not a correct statement too. All modern drivers (for last 5 years)
don't have that .get_netdev() ops, so it is not mlx5 specific, but another
justification to say that SMC-R was doing it wrong.

> Thus, using ib_device_set_netdev() now became mandatory.

ib_device_set_netdev() is mandatory for the drivers, it is nothing to do
with ULPs.

> 
> Replace ib_device_ops.get_netdev() with ib_device_get_netdev().

It is too late for me to do proper review for today, but I would say
that it is worth to pay attention to multiple dev_put() calls in the
functions around the ib_device_get_netdev().

> 
> Fixes: 54903572c23c ("net/smc: allow pnetid-less configuration")
> Fixes: 8d159eb2117b ("RDMA/mlx5: Use IB set_netdev and get_netdev functions")

It is not related to this change Fixes line.

> Reported-by: Aswin K <aswin@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  net/smc/smc_ib.c   | 8 ++------
>  net/smc/smc_pnet.c | 4 +---
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_ib.c b/net/smc/smc_ib.c
> index 9297dc20bfe2..9c563cdbea90 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc_ib.c
> +++ b/net/smc/smc_ib.c
> @@ -899,9 +899,7 @@ static void smc_copy_netdev_ifindex(struct smc_ib_device *smcibdev, int port)
>  	struct ib_device *ibdev = smcibdev->ibdev;
>  	struct net_device *ndev;
>  
> -	if (!ibdev->ops.get_netdev)
> -		return;
> -	ndev = ibdev->ops.get_netdev(ibdev, port + 1);
> +	ndev = ib_device_get_netdev(ibdev, port + 1);
>  	if (ndev) {
>  		smcibdev->ndev_ifidx[port] = ndev->ifindex;
>  		dev_put(ndev);
> @@ -921,9 +919,7 @@ void smc_ib_ndev_change(struct net_device *ndev, unsigned long event)
>  		port_cnt = smcibdev->ibdev->phys_port_cnt;
>  		for (i = 0; i < min_t(size_t, port_cnt, SMC_MAX_PORTS); i++) {
>  			libdev = smcibdev->ibdev;
> -			if (!libdev->ops.get_netdev)
> -				continue;
> -			lndev = libdev->ops.get_netdev(libdev, i + 1);
> +			lndev = ib_device_get_netdev(libdev, i + 1);
>  			dev_put(lndev);
>  			if (lndev != ndev)
>  				continue;
> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_pnet.c b/net/smc/smc_pnet.c
> index 1dd362326c0a..8566937c8903 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc_pnet.c
> +++ b/net/smc/smc_pnet.c
> @@ -1054,9 +1054,7 @@ static void smc_pnet_find_rdma_dev(struct net_device *netdev,
>  		for (i = 1; i <= SMC_MAX_PORTS; i++) {
>  			if (!rdma_is_port_valid(ibdev->ibdev, i))
>  				continue;
> -			if (!ibdev->ibdev->ops.get_netdev)
> -				continue;
> -			ndev = ibdev->ibdev->ops.get_netdev(ibdev->ibdev, i);
> +			ndev = ib_device_get_netdev(ibdev->ibdev, i);
>  			if (!ndev)
>  				continue;
>  			dev_put(ndev);
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-27 20:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-25  7:23 [PATCH net] net/smc: Fix lookup of netdev by using ib_device_get_netdev() Wenjia Zhang
2024-10-25  8:57 ` Halil Pasic
2024-10-25 14:01 ` Simon Horman
2024-10-26  0:42 ` Dust Li
2024-10-27 11:18 ` Wen Gu
2024-10-27 19:28 ` Zhu Yanjun
2024-10-27 20:18 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2024-10-27 20:30   ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-11-05  9:50   ` Wenjia Zhang
2024-11-05 11:23     ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-11-05 12:30       ` Wenjia Zhang
2024-11-05 13:39         ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-11-05 14:14           ` Wenjia Zhang
2024-11-06  9:24       ` Halil Pasic
2024-11-06 13:59         ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-11-07 11:47           ` Halil Pasic
2024-11-07 12:08             ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-11-07 11:56           ` Halil Pasic
2024-11-07 12:13             ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-11-07 23:40             ` Namjae Jeon
2024-11-08 17:59               ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-11-09  5:32                 ` Namjae Jeon
2024-10-29  8:43 ` D. Wythe
2024-10-31 10:01 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-11-05  9:53   ` Wenjia Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241027201857.GA1615717@unreal \
    --to=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=aswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jaka@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=niho@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=raspl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=twinkler@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).