netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, donald.hunter@gmail.com,
	vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev, arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com,
	saeedm@nvidia.com, leon@kernel.org, tariqt@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] dpll: add clock quality level attribute and op
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 10:14:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241028101403.67577dd9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zw93LS5X5PXXgb8-@nanopsycho.orion>

On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 10:19:57 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> Not sure what do you mean by "clock info". Dpll device and clock is kind
> >> of the same thing. The dpll device is identified by clock-id. I see no
> >> other attributes on the way this direction to more extend dpll attr
> >> namespace.  
> >
> >I'm not an expert but I think the standard definition of a DPLL
> >does not include a built-in oscillator, if that's what you mean.  
> 
> Okay. Then the clock-id we have also does not make much sense.
> Anyway, what is your desire exactly? Do you want to have a nest attr
> clock-info to contain this quality-level attr? Or something else?

I thought clock-id is basically clockid_t, IOW a reference.
I wish that the information about timekeepers was exposed 
by the time subsystem rather than DPLL. Something like clock_getres().

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-28 17:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-14  8:11 [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] dpll: expose clock quality level Jiri Pirko
2024-10-14  8:11 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] dpll: add clock quality level attribute and op Jiri Pirko
2024-10-14  8:54   ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2024-10-15 14:26   ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-15 14:38     ` Jiri Pirko
2024-10-15 15:01       ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-16  8:19         ` Jiri Pirko
2024-10-18  7:07           ` Jiri Pirko
2024-10-28 17:14           ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-10-29 12:52             ` Jiri Pirko
2024-10-29 13:51               ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-29 14:41                 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-10-16  8:21         ` Jiri Pirko
2024-10-15 14:50     ` Vadim Fedorenko
2024-10-15 14:56       ` Jiri Pirko
2024-10-15 15:01         ` Vadim Fedorenko
2024-10-16  8:17           ` Jiri Pirko
2024-10-14  8:11 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net/mlx5: DPLL, Add clock quality level op implementation Jiri Pirko
2024-10-14  8:57   ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241028101403.67577dd9@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).