From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7458D206E9A; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:34:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730212441; cv=none; b=lsydLRnJoLC42hLgcAlH9Xkc9QGDBd0Q1DcRUXuZq8z3UWTHGbLYNO0gRj88rHbwbpMbHyG+xwmSIgwUkCzyoMUpSP5VLN8hMghDAM/kknpibrA8rrx1CUp4+mkS8iywtKeQjuoDFaddvF04YorgJGW8rt5zuAeS2bKTcOzH9Jg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730212441; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZgRDBxxipce3Y8hxkR7nbzY7ay8WuNC5fEu1E9gRWrs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=P1L8ikThnljxKuw99uyTc4RXsyrLRm0xa2f2CXCLWLwe0mr1aN9SxyBmehZx4QLmXTOdGTNE+XUMXS5F+Ga2jDSpv/7ue37FsgLrPk2eJsT1GK5/93CKKUl2KKDNuAwkLLo6+uM9iS/pEUdAXv36RgHRn4s4lOIVO5hPd2aSdX8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=JkxPuELr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="JkxPuELr" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ABC49C4CEE5; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:34:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1730212441; bh=ZgRDBxxipce3Y8hxkR7nbzY7ay8WuNC5fEu1E9gRWrs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JkxPuELr1EWeQShx94jBdw0CeKJInjUHexPO/bBCOpG/27LZgh2OO+9fNeWXrwDIG GAaCLNiyC94thkTM4Eq6Nbbhr2gT5jN46J7xCzFQloN6PLX0w29ZaNLn10f15BkLxt JRfFfWxyjqa9xC/lH0pf3okSLMeQXEHgnLPb9as2vojcbCYybSlSuezSGZ1F9MiZnt Z4oo+GukFt1UW6q3RnTRsXngJi45H4i06ALF9dkvRzAZYPX1uabogE7xEEyt4C+4rU mWre5fIJYL2W68mAjmWkp+kfqn+Xm3bK//Tn9yuBLSimJc+xKXEjBAsll02/9z4dxk TmZvFp6z+MASQ== Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 07:33:59 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Yunsheng Lin Cc: , , , , Alexander Duyck , Andrew Morton , Linux-MM Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 10/10] mm: page_frag: add an entry in MAINTAINERS for page_frag Message-ID: <20241029073359.758d9b84@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <06933039-a330-4ed9-9db1-9c75cd7ae9b7@huawei.com> References: <20241028115850.3409893-1-linyunsheng@huawei.com> <20241028115850.3409893-11-linyunsheng@huawei.com> <20241028162743.75bfd8a1@kernel.org> <06933039-a330-4ed9-9db1-9c75cd7ae9b7@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 17:40:08 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote: > On 2024/10/29 7:27, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 19:58:50 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote: > >> +M: Yunsheng Lin > > > > Why is this line still here? You asked for a second opinion > > and you got one from Paolo. > > Because of the reason below? > https://lore.kernel.org/all/159495c8-71be-4a11-8c49-d528e8154841@huawei.com/ What is the reason in that link? You try to argue that the convention doesn't exist or that your case is different? The maintainer tells you their opinion in context of the posting. It seems like you're more motivated by getting into MAINTAINERS than by the work itself :/