From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 577AA17C91; Fri, 1 Nov 2024 02:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730427141; cv=none; b=Y51xTQMLQH/GbESCOWuGrhA+o3Yh3qzKOg9CUfYcgWkTLFqGEER/jORs/b5Z04KS/DFHjMql0p99EfRbTbOE6R9Gc50GS/Bu1aoNeCnuH1z2xuonX92v40EpGabtGMSLiGZNaXNGFLEHd1iH+uYjYytb7E9yi2Cy1ANNBKXYKH8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730427141; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YMMN0kGRmg3R22Sz56LclOIFIQLcsBnPC/LGFhXLclY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=njiK6erTOKPjlpgS7CfbUisXT735UbNvurk1xdet21tz4bnHno17Q5K55VDLqFmTxHTLCz3phRxVw1IoLnotly329SKKOXdJbRA4ZZ/A235+tLQv5WQ9Ti88Iasn1cC2x+AJMD0WAL7UPDkhFSG6YoFOpPidTfeTO4Ylj7EeofI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=GECURCh+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="GECURCh+" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 090C5C4CEC3; Fri, 1 Nov 2024 02:12:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1730427139; bh=YMMN0kGRmg3R22Sz56LclOIFIQLcsBnPC/LGFhXLclY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=GECURCh+OUkxqRa+boLfm4juiqNbm7Zh6TkvbVbAwpp01+2FtFb7/2EOlVUx+OAai L7fgp2AsPujMebJP4WaMVnxrRDen9wrQhDv7YRPXNGvNdvro+69TiPuzzii/KLISeP XmkwxTnI1vlA8GfI4gR9xMNeQO1d3JQqkzS+uCA6zD8BLmOmwogw4G8SY6B2QP8bUv +xjx9dRRgmcYdRJUMlU7+lDnIEQFpZr9A8MBAHUnrb7Nz4beAc+U2yaCTa1fGlb/ox FHSPPp0JDcV8om7/lb0CWPmMzey/E8hJIb+WP0U2ge90cWgKx4goUXmNBCctHuk60o nmLDJBGJcrUIw== Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 19:12:18 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Antonio Quartulli Cc: Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Donald Hunter , Shuah Khan , sd@queasysnail.net, ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com, Andrew Lunn , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, steffen.klassert@secunet.com, antony.antony@secunet.com, Shuah Khan Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v11 00/23] Introducing OpenVPN Data Channel Offload Message-ID: <20241031191218.5a90f357@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <47b7f78a-0eba-4823-9e2d-2b9d1d2d7cf3@openvpn.net> References: <20241029-b4-ovpn-v11-0-de4698c73a25@openvpn.net> <47b7f78a-0eba-4823-9e2d-2b9d1d2d7cf3@openvpn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 11:00:05 +0100 Antonio Quartulli wrote: > It seems some little changes to ovpn.yaml were not reflected in the > generated files I committed. > > Specifically I changed some U32 to BE32 (IPv4 addresses) and files were > not regenerated before committing. > > (I saw the failure in patchwork about this) > > It seems I'll have to send v12 after all. I'll apply patch 1 already, it's tangentially related, and no point rebasing.