netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Sai Krishna <saikrishnag@marvell.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sgoutham@marvell.com,
	gakula@marvell.com, lcherian@marvell.com, jerinj@marvell.com,
	hkelam@marvell.com, sbhatta@marvell.com,
	kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v2 1/6] octeontx2: Set appropriate PF, VF masks and shifts based on silicon
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 10:08:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241101100832.GC1838431@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241022185410.4036100-2-saikrishnag@marvell.com>

On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 12:24:05AM +0530, Sai Krishna wrote:
> From: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@marvell.com>
> 
> Number of RVU PFs on CN20K silicon have increased to 96 from maximum
> of 32 that were supported on earlier silicons. Every RVU PF and VF is
> identified by HW using a 16bit PF_FUNC value. Due to the change in
> Max number of PFs in CN20K, the bit encoding of this PF_FUNC has changed.
> 
> This patch handles the change by exporting PF,VF masks and shifts
> present in mailbox module to all other modules.
> 
> Also moved the NIX AF register offset macros to other files which
> will be posted in coming patches.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@marvell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sai Krishna <saikrishnag@marvell.com>

...

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu.h
> index 5016ba82e142..938a911cbf1c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu.h
> @@ -41,10 +41,10 @@
>  #define MAX_CPT_BLKS				2
>  
>  /* PF_FUNC */
> -#define RVU_PFVF_PF_SHIFT	10
> -#define RVU_PFVF_PF_MASK	0x3F
> -#define RVU_PFVF_FUNC_SHIFT	0
> -#define RVU_PFVF_FUNC_MASK	0x3FF
> +#define RVU_PFVF_PF_SHIFT	rvu_pcifunc_pf_shift
> +#define RVU_PFVF_PF_MASK	rvu_pcifunc_pf_mask
> +#define RVU_PFVF_FUNC_SHIFT	rvu_pcifunc_func_shift
> +#define RVU_PFVF_FUNC_MASK	rvu_pcifunc_func_mask

Hi Subbaraya and Sai,

I see that this is in keeping with the implementation prior to this patch.
But, FWIIW, if FIELD_PREP() and friends were used then I expect the _SHIFT
defines could be removed entirely.

Please consider as a follow-up at some point.

>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
>  struct dump_ctx {

...

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-01 10:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-22 18:54 [net-next PATCH v2 0/6] CN20K silicon with mbox support Sai Krishna
2024-10-22 18:54 ` [net-next PATCH v2 1/6] octeontx2: Set appropriate PF, VF masks and shifts based on silicon Sai Krishna
2024-11-01 10:08   ` Simon Horman [this message]
2024-11-11  9:15     ` Sai Krishna Gajula
2024-10-22 18:54 ` [net-next PATCH v2 2/6] octeontx2-af: CN20k basic mbox operations and structures Sai Krishna
2024-10-22 18:54 ` [net-next PATCH v2 3/6] octeontx2-af: CN20k mbox to support AF REQ/ACK functionality Sai Krishna
2024-11-01 10:18   ` Simon Horman
2024-11-11  8:42     ` Sai Krishna Gajula
2024-10-22 18:54 ` [net-next PATCH v2 4/6] octeontx2-pf: CN20K mbox REQ/ACK implementation for NIC PF Sai Krishna
2024-10-29 23:06   ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-11-01  5:50     ` Sai Krishna Gajula
2024-10-22 18:54 ` [net-next PATCH v2 5/6] octeontx2-af: CN20K mbox implementation for AF's VF Sai Krishna
2024-10-22 18:54 ` [net-next PATCH v2 6/6] octeontx2-pf: CN20K mbox implementation between PF-VF Sai Krishna
2024-11-01 10:04   ` Simon Horman
2024-11-12 17:48     ` Sai Krishna Gajula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241101100832.GC1838431@kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gakula@marvell.com \
    --cc=hkelam@marvell.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=saikrishnag@marvell.com \
    --cc=sbhatta@marvell.com \
    --cc=sgoutham@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).