netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: David Oberhollenzer <david.oberhollenzer@sigma-star.at>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, andrew@lunn.ch,
	Julian.FRIEDRICH@frequentis.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
	olteanv@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	upstream+netdev@sigma-star.at
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: properly shutdown PPU re-enable timer on destroy
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2024 11:35:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241103113539.7b44e4f3@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241029124332.51008-1-david.oberhollenzer@sigma-star.at>

On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:42:45 +0100 David Oberhollenzer wrote:
> The mv88e6xxx has an internal PPU that polls PHY state. If we want to
> access the internal PHYs, we need to disable it. Because enable/disable
> of the PPU is a slow operation, a 10ms timer is used to re-enable it,
> canceled with every access, so bulk operations effectively only disable
> it once and re-enable it some 10ms after the last access.
> 
> If a PHY is accessed and then the mv88e6xxx module is removed before
> the 10ms are up, the PPU re-enable ends up accessing a dangling pointer.
> 
> This is easily triggered by deferred probing during boot-up. MDIO bus
> and PHY registration may succeed, but switch registration fails later
> on, because the CPU port depends on a very slow device. In this case,
> probe() fails, but the MDIO subsystem may already have accessed bus
> or the PHYs, arming timer.
> 
> This is fixed as follows:
>  - If probe fails after mv88e6xxx_phy_init(), make sure we also call
>    mv88e6xxx_phy_destroy() before returning
>  - In mv88e6xxx_phy_destroy(), grab the ppu_mutex to make sure the work
>    function either has already exited, or (should it run) cannot do
>    anything, fails to grab the mutex and returns.
>  - In addition to destroying the timer, also destroy the work item, in
>    case the timer has already fired.
>  - Do all of this synchronously, to make sure timer & work item are
>    destroyed and none of the callbacks are running.

Looks good, AFAICT. Could you repost with a Fixes tag added?
To make the job of the stable team easier?

      reply	other threads:[~2024-11-03 19:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-29 12:42 [PATCH] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: properly shutdown PPU re-enable timer on destroy David Oberhollenzer
2024-11-03 19:35 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241103113539.7b44e4f3@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=Julian.FRIEDRICH@frequentis.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david.oberhollenzer@sigma-star.at \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=upstream+netdev@sigma-star.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).