From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Divya Koppera <divya.koppera@microchip.com>,
andrew@lunn.ch, arun.ramadoss@microchip.com,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, hkallweit1@gmail.com,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, richardcochran@gmail.com
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: phy: Makefile: Add makefile support for ptp in Microchip phys
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 11:57:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202411051137.XUgYrwtP-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241104090750.12942-5-divya.koppera@microchip.com>
Hi Divya,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on net-next/main]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Divya-Koppera/net-phy-microchip_ptp-Add-header-file-for-Microchip-ptp-library/20241104-171132
base: net-next/main
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241104090750.12942-5-divya.koppera%40microchip.com
patch subject: [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: phy: Makefile: Add makefile support for ptp in Microchip phys
config: powerpc64-randconfig-r063-20241105 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241105/202411051137.XUgYrwtP-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 14.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f28c006a5895fc0e329fe15fead81e37457cb1d1)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241105/202411051137.XUgYrwtP-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411051137.XUgYrwtP-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/net/phy/microchip_ptp.c:4:
drivers/net/phy/microchip_ptp.h:197:60: warning: declaration of 'struct phy_device' will not be visible outside of this function [-Wvisibility]
static inline struct mchp_ptp_clock *mchp_ptp_probe(struct phy_device *phydev,
^
drivers/net/phy/microchip_ptp.h:198:11: error: unknown type name 'u8'
u8 mmd, u16 clk_base,
^
drivers/net/phy/microchip_ptp.h:198:19: error: unknown type name 'u16'
u8 mmd, u16 clk_base,
^
drivers/net/phy/microchip_ptp.h:199:11: error: unknown type name 'u16'
u16 port_base)
^
drivers/net/phy/microchip_ptp.h:205:12: error: unknown type name 'u16'
u16 reg, u16 val, bool enable)
^
drivers/net/phy/microchip_ptp.h:205:21: error: unknown type name 'u16'
u16 reg, u16 val, bool enable)
^
drivers/net/phy/microchip_ptp.h:205:30: error: unknown type name 'bool'
u16 reg, u16 val, bool enable)
^
drivers/net/phy/microchip_ptp.h:210:15: error: unknown type name 'irqreturn_t'
static inline irqreturn_t mchp_ptp_handle_interrupt(struct mchp_ptp_clock *ptp_clock)
^
drivers/net/phy/microchip_ptp.h:212:9: error: use of undeclared identifier 'IRQ_NONE'
return IRQ_NONE;
^
drivers/net/phy/microchip_ptp.c:7:16: warning: declaration of 'enum ptp_fifo_dir' will not be visible outside of this function [-Wvisibility]
enum ptp_fifo_dir dir)
^
drivers/net/phy/microchip_ptp.c:7:29: error: variable has incomplete type 'enum ptp_fifo_dir'
enum ptp_fifo_dir dir)
^
drivers/net/phy/microchip_ptp.c:7:16: note: forward declaration of 'enum ptp_fifo_dir'
enum ptp_fifo_dir dir)
^
drivers/net/phy/microchip_ptp.c:9:39: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct mchp_ptp_clock'
struct phy_device *phydev = ptp_clock->phydev;
~~~~~~~~~^
drivers/net/phy/microchip_ptp.h:197:22: note: forward declaration of 'struct mchp_ptp_clock'
static inline struct mchp_ptp_clock *mchp_ptp_probe(struct phy_device *phydev,
^
drivers/net/phy/microchip_ptp.c:12:22: error: use of undeclared identifier 'MCHP_PTP_FIFO_SIZE'
for (int i = 0; i < MCHP_PTP_FIFO_SIZE; ++i) {
^
>> drivers/net/phy/microchip_ptp.c:13:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'phy_read_mmd' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
rc = phy_read_mmd(phydev, PTP_MMD(ptp_clock),
^
>> drivers/net/phy/microchip_ptp.c:13:29: error: implicit declaration of function 'PTP_MMD' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
rc = phy_read_mmd(phydev, PTP_MMD(ptp_clock),
^
drivers/net/phy/microchip_ptp.c:14:14: error: use of undeclared identifier 'PTP_EGRESS_FIFO'
dir == PTP_EGRESS_FIFO ?
^
>> drivers/net/phy/microchip_ptp.c:15:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'MCHP_PTP_TX_MSG_HEADER2' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
MCHP_PTP_TX_MSG_HEADER2(BASE_PORT(ptp_clock)) :
^
>> drivers/net/phy/microchip_ptp.c:15:31: error: implicit declaration of function 'BASE_PORT' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
MCHP_PTP_TX_MSG_HEADER2(BASE_PORT(ptp_clock)) :
^
>> drivers/net/phy/microchip_ptp.c:16:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'MCHP_PTP_RX_MSG_HEADER2' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
MCHP_PTP_RX_MSG_HEADER2(BASE_PORT(ptp_clock)));
^
drivers/net/phy/microchip_ptp.c:16:7: note: did you mean 'MCHP_PTP_TX_MSG_HEADER2'?
drivers/net/phy/microchip_ptp.c:15:7: note: 'MCHP_PTP_TX_MSG_HEADER2' declared here
MCHP_PTP_TX_MSG_HEADER2(BASE_PORT(ptp_clock)) :
^
drivers/net/phy/microchip_ptp.c:20:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'phy_read_mmd' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
return phy_read_mmd(phydev, PTP_MMD(ptp_clock),
^
drivers/net/phy/microchip_ptp.c:20:30: error: implicit declaration of function 'PTP_MMD' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
return phy_read_mmd(phydev, PTP_MMD(ptp_clock),
^
fatal error: too many errors emitted, stopping now [-ferror-limit=]
2 warnings and 20 errors generated.
vim +/phy_read_mmd +13 drivers/net/phy/microchip_ptp.c
cf630bd2326111 Divya Koppera 2024-11-04 5
cf630bd2326111 Divya Koppera 2024-11-04 6 static int mchp_ptp_flush_fifo(struct mchp_ptp_clock *ptp_clock,
cf630bd2326111 Divya Koppera 2024-11-04 7 enum ptp_fifo_dir dir)
cf630bd2326111 Divya Koppera 2024-11-04 8 {
cf630bd2326111 Divya Koppera 2024-11-04 9 struct phy_device *phydev = ptp_clock->phydev;
cf630bd2326111 Divya Koppera 2024-11-04 10 int rc;
cf630bd2326111 Divya Koppera 2024-11-04 11
cf630bd2326111 Divya Koppera 2024-11-04 12 for (int i = 0; i < MCHP_PTP_FIFO_SIZE; ++i) {
cf630bd2326111 Divya Koppera 2024-11-04 @13 rc = phy_read_mmd(phydev, PTP_MMD(ptp_clock),
cf630bd2326111 Divya Koppera 2024-11-04 14 dir == PTP_EGRESS_FIFO ?
cf630bd2326111 Divya Koppera 2024-11-04 @15 MCHP_PTP_TX_MSG_HEADER2(BASE_PORT(ptp_clock)) :
cf630bd2326111 Divya Koppera 2024-11-04 @16 MCHP_PTP_RX_MSG_HEADER2(BASE_PORT(ptp_clock)));
cf630bd2326111 Divya Koppera 2024-11-04 17 if (rc < 0)
cf630bd2326111 Divya Koppera 2024-11-04 18 return rc;
cf630bd2326111 Divya Koppera 2024-11-04 19 }
cf630bd2326111 Divya Koppera 2024-11-04 20 return phy_read_mmd(phydev, PTP_MMD(ptp_clock),
cf630bd2326111 Divya Koppera 2024-11-04 21 MCHP_PTP_INT_STS(BASE_PORT(ptp_clock)));
cf630bd2326111 Divya Koppera 2024-11-04 22 }
cf630bd2326111 Divya Koppera 2024-11-04 23
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-05 3:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-04 9:07 [PATCH net-next 0/5] Add ptp library for Microchip phys Divya Koppera
2024-11-04 9:07 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: phy: microchip_ptp : Add header file for Microchip ptp library Divya Koppera
2024-11-04 9:07 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: phy: microchip_ptp : Add ptp library for Microchip phys Divya Koppera
2024-11-04 12:32 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2024-11-05 10:08 ` Divya.Koppera
2024-11-07 14:34 ` Simon Horman
2024-11-11 4:55 ` Divya.Koppera
2024-11-04 9:07 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: phy: Kconfig: Add ptp library support and 1588 optional flag in " Divya Koppera
2024-11-04 9:07 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: phy: Makefile: Add makefile support for ptp " Divya Koppera
2024-11-05 1:40 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-05 3:57 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-11-04 9:07 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: phy: microchip_t1 : Add initialization of ptp for lan887x Divya Koppera
2024-11-04 14:04 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-11-05 6:17 ` Divya.Koppera
2024-11-05 3:14 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202411051137.XUgYrwtP-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=arun.ramadoss@microchip.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=divya.koppera@microchip.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).