From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91C1E212D2F; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 15:59:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730995185; cv=none; b=hbaUAgEtJ3oeXY2gCjZ4pMaHqNUiS+1UBWHzttY1pItjtiADCY38Zr5M3sRFuwQKQKdws42AQpRWadMpY584fvOBcKeH4y7xHmzTmzkfLfhzFD4vWwwDyTWtwdsPO5Y/o5UiaeIRk3Iu8uephlTteF/wkTL7ZvPOwyTQsLI7K3s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730995185; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XOKShilNEm9Nnm1tXX9CAaQcYToZT7HxAyXsjNfZlo4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=r5Qx71Z+8Rnzv7/aZKNZJTyNIKFC2X0aRBawEWnuctTZ2eZ7BLAXTw3+85jkJZZsNQODTo4vox6aRiaWuxHmQw+ZT9itQ3expb4LO4nuKVrYX2VYxeOxv7AfUu5IkDo+TTDafp24YpjqXq4M0pbH/i8cs/w6XniDfNy/LXKKLzI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=WDZenKXU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="WDZenKXU" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A9C2FC4CECC; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 15:59:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1730995185; bh=XOKShilNEm9Nnm1tXX9CAaQcYToZT7HxAyXsjNfZlo4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WDZenKXUeXr7gS0DDjWrAL0m8nrkJYxyirYLZExoi2+lwJ6jfjQI1KMCXKmKOXGoK n8TEzDgP6Pd1rdz8q3CDKxEtLE+uy/qaU2F4cmbtpagz0Trd0NAFjC2o+06xztyF8D xb/yud13fgIrCH8YhanFBYmUtAvSsSIgU2cwSP1m9GBb0OeIHNmEHYJlBed6uRYGBD /ygFoevfgkLQbynA0jz3AC5rPk2F1BjBXCvwv0nOKOk/dCWkdsKo9uVNKaJrIihDHX sDCn6ihE7vlP39laURtRKIdkmRejTPP8f6MFYhNMZhRb0V7bjQ242+rPZBpdujTp83 LhAnx6aveCqGg== Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 07:59:43 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Xiao Liang Cc: Eric Dumazet , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Kuniyuki Iwashima , "David S. Miller" , David Ahern , Paolo Abeni , Ido Schimmel , Andrew Lunn , Simon Horman , Donald Hunter , Shuah Khan , Jiri Pirko , Hangbin Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/8] net: ip_gre: Add netns_atomic module parameter Message-ID: <20241107075943.78bb160c@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20241107133004.7469-1-shaw.leon@gmail.com> <20241107133004.7469-6-shaw.leon@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 22:11:24 +0800 Xiao Liang wrote: > > Instead, add new rtnetlink attributes ? > > It is to control driver behavior at rtnl_ops registration time. I > think rtnetlink > attributes are too late for that, maybe? Can't think of a way other than > module parameters or register separate ops. Any suggestions? Step back from the implementation you have a little, forget that there is a boolean in rtnl_link_ops. User makes a request to spawn an interface, surely a flag inside that request can dictate how the netns attrs are interpreted.