From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@marvell.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sgoutham@marvell.com, gakula@marvell.com, sbhatta@marvell.com,
hkelam@marvell.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, jerinj@marvell.com,
lcherian@marvell.com, ndabilpuram@marvell.com,
sd@queasysnail.net
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v9 1/8] octeontx2-pf: map skb data as device writeable
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 16:23:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241110142303.GA50588@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241108045708.1205994-2-bbhushan2@marvell.com>
On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 10:27:01AM +0530, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
> Crypto hardware need write permission for in-place encrypt
> or decrypt operation on skb-data to support IPsec crypto
> offload. That patch uses skb_unshare to make skb data writeable
> for ipsec crypto offload and map skb fragment memory as
> device read-write.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@marvell.com>
> ---
> v7->v8:
> - spell correction (s/sdk/skb) in description
>
> v6->v7:
> - skb data was mapped as device writeable but it was not ensured
> that skb is writeable. This version calls skb_unshare() to make
> skb data writeable.
>
> .../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_txrx.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_txrx.c
> index 7aaf32e9aa95..49b6b091ba41 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_txrx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_txrx.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include <linux/bpf.h>
> #include <linux/bpf_trace.h>
> #include <net/ip6_checksum.h>
> +#include <net/xfrm.h>
>
> #include "otx2_reg.h"
> #include "otx2_common.h"
> @@ -83,10 +84,17 @@ static unsigned int frag_num(unsigned int i)
> static dma_addr_t otx2_dma_map_skb_frag(struct otx2_nic *pfvf,
> struct sk_buff *skb, int seg, int *len)
> {
> + enum dma_data_direction dir = DMA_TO_DEVICE;
> const skb_frag_t *frag;
> struct page *page;
> int offset;
>
> + /* Crypto hardware need write permission for ipsec crypto offload */
> + if (unlikely(xfrm_offload(skb))) {
> + dir = DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL;
> + skb = skb_unshare(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + }
> +
> /* First segment is always skb->data */
> if (!seg) {
> page = virt_to_page(skb->data);
> @@ -98,16 +106,22 @@ static dma_addr_t otx2_dma_map_skb_frag(struct otx2_nic *pfvf,
> offset = skb_frag_off(frag);
> *len = skb_frag_size(frag);
> }
> - return otx2_dma_map_page(pfvf, page, offset, *len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> + return otx2_dma_map_page(pfvf, page, offset, *len, dir);
Did I read correctly and you perform DMA mapping on every SKB in data path?
How bad does it perform if you enable IOMMU?
Thanks
> }
>
> static void otx2_dma_unmap_skb_frags(struct otx2_nic *pfvf, struct sg_list *sg)
> {
> + enum dma_data_direction dir = DMA_TO_DEVICE;
> + struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
> int seg;
>
> + skb = (struct sk_buff *)sg->skb;
> + if (unlikely(xfrm_offload(skb)))
> + dir = DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL;
> +
> for (seg = 0; seg < sg->num_segs; seg++) {
> otx2_dma_unmap_page(pfvf, sg->dma_addr[seg],
> - sg->size[seg], DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> + sg->size[seg], dir);
> }
> sg->num_segs = 0;
> }
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-10 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-08 4:57 [net-next PATCH v9 0/8] cn10k-ipsec: Add outbound inline ipsec support Bharat Bhushan
2024-11-08 4:57 ` [net-next PATCH v9 1/8] octeontx2-pf: map skb data as device writeable Bharat Bhushan
2024-11-10 14:23 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2024-11-11 5:01 ` Bharat Bhushan
2024-11-11 7:15 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-11-11 8:50 ` Bharat Bhushan
2024-11-08 4:57 ` [net-next PATCH v9 2/8] octeontx2-pf: Move skb fragment map/unmap to common code Bharat Bhushan
2024-11-08 4:57 ` [net-next PATCH v9 3/8] octeontx2-af: Disable backpressure between CPT and NIX Bharat Bhushan
2024-11-08 4:57 ` [net-next PATCH v9 4/8] cn10k-ipsec: Init hardware for outbound ipsec crypto offload Bharat Bhushan
2024-11-08 4:57 ` [net-next PATCH v9 5/8] cn10k-ipsec: Add SA add/del support for outb " Bharat Bhushan
2024-11-12 12:41 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-11-15 10:13 ` Bharat Bhushan
2024-11-08 4:57 ` [net-next PATCH v9 6/8] cn10k-ipsec: Process outbound " Bharat Bhushan
2024-11-12 12:48 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-11-15 10:16 ` Bharat Bhushan
2024-11-08 4:57 ` [net-next PATCH v9 7/8] cn10k-ipsec: Allow ipsec crypto offload for skb with SA Bharat Bhushan
2024-11-08 4:57 ` [net-next PATCH v9 8/8] cn10k-ipsec: Enable outbound ipsec crypto offload Bharat Bhushan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241110142303.GA50588@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=bbhushan2@marvell.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gakula@marvell.com \
--cc=hkelam@marvell.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sbhatta@marvell.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=sgoutham@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).