From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BD954409; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 00:12:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731370327; cv=none; b=ilHE1VyUbD0dtdMSVCJzLAouV2veYmRKzqG/XuH/H9G1VDjOkpTKX0N6xmMlRTn4NaZFb4phbfMl0U2lSkinnYpnY3Q2F1kynR2Z/PfqPP8aXsiEkq22d7ECL/MCK4JfwmP91a8RHby+14eql1jTP8K9IaB/bahl+k4PGNW5zPE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731370327; c=relaxed/simple; bh=F6KtVDx7kefgsDbbvSvre0SI4ek2HJre6EpkN5nZLpw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=O1OQkdDdsZ8a2XjqEkj3dpe+WC9a5T2/bMe9sEhjRLo2Yqv5REDVRUzhThcUZRHGfwv5DQ/3I3Fysi19wyREP4pf0U9PX+wtAkxIJgN6vUJdk16Obfv9UrviFxEJ8yN9olzelEaSY0NH0PMFnVMUMiOV2HtwhiNpjFB45Vq1+v8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=FYtWjqgo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="FYtWjqgo" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ACB5FC4CECF; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 00:12:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1731370327; bh=F6KtVDx7kefgsDbbvSvre0SI4ek2HJre6EpkN5nZLpw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=FYtWjqgoyYor2KQxuCduFyVPGGug7Lae6Zmq//DBd3J775HaM3IaD89LNwlzGfzg8 OTbdTKXJNxQ7RyTm/Uf3WjPXmMeT5O+324PbmckBkAIr+vu3Hisv/RQ+px6riH/ew9 EvzwcyclN8+IzKBkfEDqUbK5gE4mrRnEDF5MObJoeQoQxwuk1cOoO6ls0My5yu96wx AslbCPGQqKPkw4swgS1D4SPmEY0D2GeJvPbvqytMxbsfghFSySvHDlc7/qImqc3ZgG frjtrVU+2NYAa3e1d2JYggboGUkn5HZd4Q36XxubIDtQnn2ie3QdpX7feyV1rmruUu dFA/HxKRYepAQ== Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 16:12:05 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Maxime Chevallier Cc: Alexandre Torgue , Jose Abreu , Andrew Lunn , davem@davemloft.net, Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Maxime Coquelin , Richard Cochran , Alexis =?UTF-8?B?TG90aG9yw6k=?= , Thomas Petazzoni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/9] net: stmmac: Introduce dwmac1000 ptp_clock_info and operations Message-ID: <20241111161205.25c53c62@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20241106090331.56519-5-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> References: <20241106090331.56519-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> <20241106090331.56519-5-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 10:03:25 +0100 Maxime Chevallier wrote: > + mutex_unlock(&priv->aux_ts_lock); > + > + /* wait for auxts fifo clear to finish */ > + ret = readl_poll_timeout(ptpaddr + PTP_TCR, tcr_val, > + !(tcr_val & GMAC_PTP_TCR_ATSFC), > + 10, 10000); Is there a good reason to wait for the flush to complete outside of the mutex?