From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>
Cc: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>, Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>,
davem@davemloft.net, mkubecek@suse.cz, martin.lau@linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH ethtool-next] rxclass: Make output for RSS context action explicit
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 07:24:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241112072434.71dc5236@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7fd1c60a-3514-a880-6f63-7b6dfdc20de4@gmail.com>
On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 09:24:07 +0000 Edward Cree wrote:
> On 09/11/2024 17:42, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > - fixes for helpers used in "is the queue in use" checks like
> > ethtool_get_max_rss_ctx_channel()
>
> If there's an RSS context that names a queue, but no rxnfc filters
> currently target that context, should the queue be considered "in
> use" or not? (Currently it is.)
> I'm trying to figure out how much of ethtool_get_max_rss_ctx_channel
> can be subsumed by the logic I'll need to add to
> ethtool_get_max_rxnfc_channel; if we don't count unused contexts as
> 'using' their queues then ethtool_get_max_rss_ctx_channel() can
> almost entirely disappear.
Hm, interesting idea...
Practically speaking I think it introduces complexity and I'm not sure
anyone will actually benefit (IOW why would anyone want to keep /
create context for inactive queues?).
Drivers may not expect to have contexts pointing to disabled queues.
My gut feeling is that we should just leave a comment for posterity
somewhere in the code but continue to validate both based on rules
and based on "direct" context membership.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-12 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-08 19:32 [PATCH ethtool-next] rxclass: Make output for RSS context action explicit Daniel Xu
2024-11-08 19:35 ` Daniel Xu
2024-11-08 19:56 ` Edward Cree
2024-11-08 20:34 ` Joe Damato
2024-11-08 20:43 ` Joe Damato
2024-11-08 21:13 ` Edward Cree
2024-11-08 22:50 ` Daniel Xu
2024-11-09 17:42 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-11-11 10:47 ` Edward Cree
2024-11-11 18:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-11-12 9:24 ` Edward Cree
2024-11-12 15:24 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-11-13 3:30 ` Edward Cree
2024-11-14 0:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-11-14 0:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-11-14 23:04 ` Edward Cree
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241112072434.71dc5236@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
--cc=ecree.xilinx@gmail.com \
--cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).