From: Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@163.com>
To: martin.lau@linux.dev, edumazet@google.com, jakub@cloudflare.com,
davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, horms@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net
Cc: mykolal@fb.com, ast@kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org,
jolsa@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, shuah@kernel.org,
sdf@fomichev.me, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
haoluo@google.com, song@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, mhal@rbox.co, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@163.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf v4 0/2] bpf: fix recursive lock and add test
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 11:09:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241118030910.36230-1-mrpre@163.com> (raw)
1. fix recursive lock when ebpf prog return SK_PASS.
2. add selftest to reproduce recursive lock.
Note that the test code can reproduce the 'dead-lock' and if just
the selftest merged without first patch, the test case will
definitely fail, because the issue of deadlock is inevitable.
---
v2->v4: fix line length reported by patchwork and remove unused code.
(max_line_length is set to 80 in patchwork but default is 100 in kernel tree)
v1->v2: 1.inspired by martin.lau to add selftest to reproduce the issue.
2. follow the community rules for patch.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/55fc6114-7e64-4b65-86d2-92cfd1e9e92f@linux.dev/T/#u
---
Jiayuan Chen (2):
bpf: fix recursive lock when verdict program return SK_PASS
selftests/bpf: Add some tests with sockmap SK_PASS
net/core/skmsg.c | 4 +-
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
2.43.5
next reply other threads:[~2024-11-18 3:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-18 3:09 Jiayuan Chen [this message]
2024-11-18 3:09 ` [PATCH bpf v4 1/2] bpf: fix recursive lock when verdict program return SK_PASS Jiayuan Chen
2024-11-18 3:09 ` [PATCH bpf v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add some tests with sockmap SK_PASS Jiayuan Chen
2024-11-18 21:39 ` [PATCH bpf v4 0/2] bpf: fix recursive lock and add test Martin KaFai Lau
2024-11-19 4:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241118030910.36230-1-mrpre@163.com \
--to=mrpre@163.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mhal@rbox.co \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).