From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, netdev-driver-reviewers@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [ANN] netdev development stats for 6.13
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:16:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241119191608.514ea226@kernel.org> (raw)
Intro
-----
As is tradition here are the development statistics based on mailing
list traffic on netdev@vger.
These stats are somewhat like LWN stats: https://lwn.net/Articles/956765/
but more focused on mailing list participation. And by participation
we mean reviewing code more than producing patches.
Previous stats (for 6.12): https://lore.kernel.org/20240922190125.24697d06@kernel.org
General stats
-------------
The cycles was about 10% busier than the previous one, in terms of
messages on the list (293 msg/day, +9.0% from 6.12) and applied
commits (21 commits/day, +9.8%). There was also 10% more people
emailing list list.
Fraction of reviewed commits (by counting git tags) went down
by 1% to 70%, while the fraction of commits reviewed by people
with a different email domain moved up 2% to 60%.
The increase in traffic is entirely expected as the previous cycle
overlapped with summer vacations. Next cycle will likely go down again,
due to winter festivities...
Testing
-------
We merged a similar number of changes for selftests as in previous
cycle (102). Since we merged more commits - this is a proportional
decrease. It's not what I hoped for, but subjectively I think there
is a clear increase in the number of reviewers asking for selftests
to be added or extended with new code or fixes. So it _feels_ like
the shift towards more structured testing is happening.
The enabling CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST in our CI caused a regression
in the number of ignored tests. We are ignoring 11 tests up from
8 in 6.12. The fixes are WIP so I'm not too concerned.
The ranking of people who contributed most to selftests:
Contributions to selftests:
1 [ 20] Petr Machata
2 [ 12] Stanislav Fomichev
3 [ 8] Jakub Kicinski
4 [ 5] Sabrina Dubroca
5 [ 4] Yunsheng Lin
6 [ 4] Hangbin Liu
7 [ 3] Mohan Prasad J
8 [ 3] Edward Cree
9 [ 3] Breno Leitao
10 [ 3] Paolo Abeni
Notably Petr added a form of "defer" for bash scripts.
Developer rankings
------------------
Top reviewers (cs): Top reviewers (msg):
1 ( +1) [35] Simon Horman 1 ( ) [58] Jakub Kicinski
2 ( -1) [29] Jakub Kicinski 2 ( ) [57] Simon Horman
3 ( ) [18] Andrew Lunn 3 ( ) [51] Andrew Lunn
4 ( ) [12] Paolo Abeni 4 ( ) [25] Eric Dumazet
5 ( ) [ 8] Eric Dumazet 5 ( +1) [19] Paolo Abeni
6 ( +6) [ 5] Kuniyuki Iwashima 6 ( -1) [16] Willem de Bruijn
7 (+19) [ 4] Russell King 7 ( +8) [16] Vladimir Oltean
8 ( -1) [ 4] Willem de Bruijn 8 ( +8) [13] Kuniyuki Iwashima
9 ( ) [ 4] Jacob Keller 9 ( -2) [11] Krzysztof Kozlowski
10 (+25) [ 3] Vladimir Oltean 10 (***) [ 9] Mina Almasry
11 ( -5) [ 3] Krzysztof Kozlowski 11 (+31) [ 9] Russell King
12 (+10) [ 3] David Ahern 12 ( -2) [ 8] Jacob Keller
13 (***) [ 3] Kalesh Anakkur Purayil 13 (***) [ 7] Vadim Fedorenko
14 (+11) [ 3] Ido Schimmel 14 (+46) [ 7] Martin KaFai Lau
15 (+23) [ 3] Vadim Fedorenko 15 (***) [ 7] Frank Li
A lot of familiar names in the top 15 reviewers. Quite a few names
reappearing after a period of lower activity, the returns are greatly
appreciated. Kalesh and Vadim may be appearing here for the first time,
focusing on general driver reviews. Frank Li has been reviewing mostly
NXP ENETC patches, which were so numerous they were enough to earn
the 15th position :)
Big thanks to all the reviewers for their invaluable work!
Top authors (cs): Top authors (msg):
1 ( +2) [5] Rosen Penev 1 ( +8) [30] Rosen Penev
2 ( +3) [4] Eric Dumazet 2 (+44) [22] Kuniyuki Iwashima
3 (***) [3] Heiner Kallweit 3 (+30) [17] Joe Damato
4 ( -3) [3] Jakub Kicinski 4 (***) [17] Wei Fang
5 (+41) [2] Hangbin Liu 5 (+13) [16] Tariq Toukan
No surprises for top authors. Rosen Penev has been posting driver "updates"
to convert them to newer APIs. Kuniyuki is pushing forward with rtnl lock
breakup. Joe added NAPI netlink support to a lot of drivers.
Top scores (positive): Top scores (negative):
1 ( +1) [485] Simon Horman 1 ( +6) [119] Rosen Penev
2 ( -1) [445] Jakub Kicinski 2 (+26) [ 59] David Howells
3 ( ) [328] Andrew Lunn 3 (+44) [ 55] Antonio Quartulli
4 ( +1) [149] Paolo Abeni 4 (***) [ 55] Wei Fang
5 ( -1) [118] Eric Dumazet 5 (+29) [ 53] Menglong Dong
6 ( +1) [ 79] Willem de Bruijn 6 (***) [ 51] Chia-Yu Chang
7 (+17) [ 69] Vladimir Oltean 7 ( +7) [ 49] Tariq Toukan
8 ( -2) [ 68] Krzysztof Kozlowski 8 ( -5) [ 44] Jijie Shao
9 (***) [ 47] Kalesh Anakkur Purayil 9 ( -4) [ 38] Yunsheng Lin
10 (***) [ 46] Ido Schimmel 10 (***) [ 31] Joe Damato
As a reminder - the "scores" are a measure of patches posted vs reviewed.
The positive side is self-explanatory, on the right side we have some
folks who are revising big patch sets and performing conversions.
While slightly negative scores are likely okay, I hope that those with
negative scores will reflect on their contributions.
Company rankings
----------------
Top reviewers (cs): Top reviewers (msg):
1 ( ) [47] RedHat 1 ( ) [100] RedHat
2 ( ) [33] Meta 2 ( ) [ 83] Meta
3 ( +1) [18] Andrew Lunn 3 ( ) [ 64] Google
4 ( -1) [18] Intel 4 ( ) [ 51] Andrew Lunn
5 ( ) [16] Google 5 ( ) [ 50] Intel
6 ( +1) [ 8] nVidia 6 ( +1) [ 20] Linaro
7 ( +2) [ 7] Broadcom 7 ( -1) [ 18] nVidia
Top authors (cs): Top authors (msg):
1 ( ) [14] RedHat 1 ( ) [69] Intel
2 ( +3) [ 8] Intel 2 ( +1) [58] RedHat
3 ( +1) [ 7] Meta 3 ( -1) [39] Huawei
4 ( -1) [ 7] Google 4 ( +1) [35] Meta
5 ( -3) [ 6] Huawei 5 ( -1) [33] nVidia
6 ( +6) [ 5] Minerva Networks 6 ( +5) [30] Minerva Networks
7 ( -1) [ 4] nVidia 7 (+10) [27] NXP
Top scores (positive): Top scores (negative):
1 ( ) [532] RedHat 1 ( ) [140] Huawei
2 ( ) [448] Meta 2 ( +2) [119] Minerva Networks
3 ( ) [328] Andrew Lunn 3 (***) [ 55] OpenVPN
4 ( ) [258] Google 4 (+20) [ 54] ZTE
5 ( ) [118] Linaro 5 (***) [ 51] Nokia
6 ( +2) [ 97] Broadcom 6 (+13) [ 36] Marvell
7 (+15) [ 52] Intel 7 (+21) [ 32] MediaTek
--
Code: https://github.com/kuba-moo/ml-stat
Raw output: https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/static/nipa/stats-6.13/stdout
reply other threads:[~2024-11-20 3:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241119191608.514ea226@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev-driver-reviewers@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).