netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: netdev: operstate UNKNOWN for loopback and other devices?
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 09:08:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241120090832.5b413ed4@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241119192353.2862779e@kernel.org>

On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:23:53 -0800
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:37:03 -0800 Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > It looks like loopback and other software devices never get the operstate
> > set correctly. Not a serious problem, but it is incorrect.
> > 
> > For example:
> > $ ip -br link
> > lo               UNKNOWN        00:00:00:00:00:00 <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> 
> > 
> > tap0             UNKNOWN        ca:ff:ed:bf:96:a0 <BROADCAST,PROMISC,UP,LOWER_UP> 
> > tap1             UNKNOWN        36:f5:16:d1:4c:15 <BROADCAST,PROMISC,UP,LOWER_UP> 
> > 
> > For wireless and ethernet devices kernel reports UP and DOWN correctly.
> > 
> > Looks like some missing bits in dev_open but not sure exactly where.  
> 
> I thought it means the driver doesn't have any notion of the carrier,
> IOW the carrier will never go down. Basically those drivers don't
> call netif_carrier_{on,off}() at all, and rely on carrier being on
> by default at netdev registration.

Tap device does have concept of pseudo carrier. If application has file descriptor
open it reports carrier, if the device is present but application has not opened
it then carrier is reported down.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-20 17:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-19 23:37 netdev: operstate UNKNOWN for loopback and other devices? Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-20  3:23 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-11-20 17:08   ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-02-03 19:17 Yong Wang
2025-02-04 11:58 ` Ido Schimmel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241120090832.5b413ed4@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).