From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Chris Lew <quic_clew@quicinc.com>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Hemant Kumar <quic_hemantk@quicinc.com>,
Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>,
Maxim Kochetkov <fido_max@inbox.ru>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@oss.qualcomm.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: qrtr: mhi: synchronize qrtr and mhi preparation
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:34:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241124150422.nt67aonfknfhz3sc@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b1e22673-2768-445c-8c67-eae93206cca5@quicinc.com>
On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 04:28:41PM -0800, Chris Lew wrote:
>
>
> On 11/8/2024 2:32 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 05:29:37PM -0800, Chris Lew wrote:
> > > From: Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@codeaurora.org>
> > >
> > > The call to qrtr_endpoint_register() was moved before
> > > mhi_prepare_for_transfer_autoqueue() to prevent a case where a dl
> > > callback can occur before the qrtr endpoint is registered.
> > >
> > > Now the reverse can happen where qrtr will try to send a packet
> > > before the channels are prepared. Add a wait in the sending path to
> > > ensure the channels are prepared before trying to do a ul transfer.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 68a838b84eff ("net: qrtr: start MHI channel after endpoit creation")
> > > Reported-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
> > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/ZyTtVdkCCES0lkl4@hovoldconsulting.com/
> > > Signed-off-by: Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@codeaurora.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Chris Lew <quic_clew@quicinc.com>
> >
> > > @@ -53,6 +54,10 @@ static int qcom_mhi_qrtr_send(struct qrtr_endpoint *ep, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > > if (skb->sk)
> > > sock_hold(skb->sk);
> > > + rc = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&qdev->prepared);
> > > + if (rc)
> > > + goto free_skb;
> > > +
> > > rc = skb_linearize(skb);
> > > if (rc)
> > > goto free_skb;
> > > @@ -85,6 +90,7 @@ static int qcom_mhi_qrtr_probe(struct mhi_device *mhi_dev,
> > > qdev->mhi_dev = mhi_dev;
> > > qdev->dev = &mhi_dev->dev;
> > > qdev->ep.xmit = qcom_mhi_qrtr_send;
> > > + init_completion(&qdev->prepared);
> > > dev_set_drvdata(&mhi_dev->dev, qdev);
> > > rc = qrtr_endpoint_register(&qdev->ep, QRTR_EP_NID_AUTO);
> > > @@ -97,6 +103,7 @@ static int qcom_mhi_qrtr_probe(struct mhi_device *mhi_dev,
> > > qrtr_endpoint_unregister(&qdev->ep);
> > > return rc;
> > > }
> > > + complete_all(&qdev->prepared);
> > > dev_dbg(qdev->dev, "Qualcomm MHI QRTR driver probed\n");
> >
> > While this probably works, it still looks like a bit of a hack.
> >
> > Why can't you restructure the code so that the channels are fully
> > initialised before you register or enable them instead?
> >
>
> Ok, I think we will have to stop using the autoqueue feature of MHI and
> change the flow to be mhi_prepare_for_transfer() -->
> qrtr_endpoint_register() --> mhi_queue_buf(DMA_FROM_DEVICE). This would make
> it so ul_transfers only happen after mhi_prepare_for_transfer() and
> dl_transfers happen after qrtr_endpoint_register().
>
> I'll take a stab at implementing this.
>
Hmm, I thought 'autoqueue' was used for a specific reason. So it is not valid
now?
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-24 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-05 1:29 [PATCH] net: qrtr: mhi: synchronize qrtr and mhi preparation Chris Lew
2024-11-06 9:14 ` Maxim Kochetkov
2024-11-07 11:27 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-11-07 19:58 ` Chris Lew
2024-11-08 10:32 ` Johan Hovold
2024-11-22 0:28 ` Chris Lew
2024-11-24 15:04 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2024-11-25 19:05 ` Chris Lew
2025-03-18 8:03 ` Johan Hovold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241124150422.nt67aonfknfhz3sc@thinkpad \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=bbhatt@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fido_max@inbox.ru \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loic.poulain@linaro.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=quic_clew@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_hemantk@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).