From: Konstantin Shkolnyy <kshk@linux.ibm.com>
To: sgarzare@redhat.com
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru, mst@redhat.com,
Konstantin Shkolnyy <kshk@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH net v8 1/3] vsock/test: fix failures due to wrong SO_RCVLOWAT parameter
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 09:06:54 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241203150656.287028-2-kshk@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241203150656.287028-1-kshk@linux.ibm.com>
This happens on 64-bit big-endian machines.
SO_RCVLOWAT requires an int parameter. However, instead of int, the test
uses unsigned long in one place and size_t in another. Both are 8 bytes
long on 64-bit machines. The kernel, having received the 8 bytes, doesn't
test for the exact size of the parameter, it only cares that it's >=
sizeof(int), and casts the 4 lower-addressed bytes to an int, which, on
a big-endian machine, contains 0. 0 doesn't trigger an error, SO_RCVLOWAT
returns with success and the socket stays with the default SO_RCVLOWAT = 1,
which results in vsock_test failures, while vsock_perf doesn't even notice
that it's failed to change it.
Fixes: b1346338fbae ("vsock_test: POLLIN + SO_RCVLOWAT test")
Fixes: 542e893fbadc ("vsock/test: two tests to check credit update logic")
Fixes: 8abbffd27ced ("test/vsock: vsock_perf utility")
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Shkolnyy <kshk@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
---
tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c | 6 +++---
tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c
index 4e8578f815e0..22633c2848cc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static float get_gbps(unsigned long bits, time_t ns_delta)
((float)ns_delta / NSEC_PER_SEC);
}
-static void run_receiver(unsigned long rcvlowat_bytes)
+static void run_receiver(int rcvlowat_bytes)
{
unsigned int read_cnt;
time_t rx_begin_ns;
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static void run_receiver(unsigned long rcvlowat_bytes)
printf("Listen port %u\n", port);
printf("RX buffer %lu bytes\n", buf_size_bytes);
printf("vsock buffer %lu bytes\n", vsock_buf_bytes);
- printf("SO_RCVLOWAT %lu bytes\n", rcvlowat_bytes);
+ printf("SO_RCVLOWAT %d bytes\n", rcvlowat_bytes);
fd = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
@@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ static long strtolx(const char *arg)
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
unsigned long to_send_bytes = DEFAULT_TO_SEND_BYTES;
- unsigned long rcvlowat_bytes = DEFAULT_RCVLOWAT_BYTES;
+ int rcvlowat_bytes = DEFAULT_RCVLOWAT_BYTES;
int peer_cid = -1;
bool sender = false;
diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
index 8d38dbf8f41f..7fd25b814b4b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
@@ -835,7 +835,7 @@ static void test_stream_poll_rcvlowat_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
static void test_stream_poll_rcvlowat_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
{
- unsigned long lowat_val = RCVLOWAT_BUF_SIZE;
+ int lowat_val = RCVLOWAT_BUF_SIZE;
char buf[RCVLOWAT_BUF_SIZE];
struct pollfd fds;
short poll_flags;
@@ -1357,7 +1357,7 @@ static void test_stream_rcvlowat_def_cred_upd_client(const struct test_opts *opt
static void test_stream_credit_update_test(const struct test_opts *opts,
bool low_rx_bytes_test)
{
- size_t recv_buf_size;
+ int recv_buf_size;
struct pollfd fds;
size_t buf_size;
void *buf;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-03 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-03 15:06 [PATCH net v8 0/3] vsock/test: fix wrong setsockopt() parameters Konstantin Shkolnyy
2024-12-03 15:06 ` Konstantin Shkolnyy [this message]
2024-12-03 15:06 ` [PATCH net v8 2/3] vsock/test: fix parameter types in SO_VM_SOCKETS_* calls Konstantin Shkolnyy
2024-12-03 15:06 ` [PATCH net v8 3/3] vsock/test: verify socket options after setting them Konstantin Shkolnyy
2024-12-05 10:50 ` [PATCH net v8 0/3] vsock/test: fix wrong setsockopt() parameters patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241203150656.287028-2-kshk@linux.ibm.com \
--to=kshk@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).