From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC5B2802; Wed, 4 Dec 2024 02:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733278036; cv=none; b=AC0dlgEyP/jZ5fa0pPs9o9eq/9cNVoDxbYfW3f7pTPJh2sf5XW9uaYFLF/wyz+jTIDjyL59qhx5/EXB8ODdC09cjiFcgYsQKUY6hp0odgQCVJBQyfv5ymGuJzquxTZk4Q1aAzGvirXX2j7Mrj8D4AGCqNyR7ihqPLu8okGt7LC0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733278036; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lCX3itGwT3xJJBqJ/zED6zfmra//WYBjFA7KgoQSvnQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fgtxVSqFriZAZ8tPbE08gHQ2FfIz7lp+oiE+ItJeSVTEvYX0ISgJBMHCsBU9Of3z9nRWFR5KyECNnhOI8E9pcGY7Ze4e9+aMUQ9TKswrrAhS3+vBFyWpwqdApO/GVtIvRqMJV/Hiz1O37ZHaT3lzePorrinY7H7xRweF0UQIcaY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=JAD9Hk2H; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="JAD9Hk2H" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 325A1C4CEDC; Wed, 4 Dec 2024 02:07:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1733278035; bh=lCX3itGwT3xJJBqJ/zED6zfmra//WYBjFA7KgoQSvnQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JAD9Hk2HJ9Dl2gSyfwyudwo1s9AA2zPs2S/5/5dEN5BVNaQ3sjYIMxMWc8XNnc5BO J8aJlR4hQWWuJ0wKt39occ59Zc/E0moOIAE7DnDNUjicrR6FCNMadAIKgOsfD5f+aA v47Nv6byHq8t0PmSEh5gNni8dDPhL6qyNlxK6Vo5mmQsUL7LrYotF/872TQcuR9h5c 6LCoGdnbo8PdrqUmow9xKNMubLhpQW4ip8YFYmjV9GkDwfwDpPOu+n8hBR3GPO2gYA tAghaRO2PXyWZfQN+NCgaoPHqUzteoXvJ/d9NZ71q2LZJafCMbHb14mBI3AYHxyI3q 5T1gWqn+kfEPA== Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 18:07:14 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Donald Hunter Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Johannes Berg , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, donald.hunter@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 4/7] tools/net/ynl: accept IP string inputs Message-ID: <20241203180714.45a2af81@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20241203130655.45293-5-donald.hunter@gmail.com> References: <20241203130655.45293-1-donald.hunter@gmail.com> <20241203130655.45293-5-donald.hunter@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 13:06:52 +0000 Donald Hunter wrote: > + def _from_string(self, string, display_hint, type): Any reason not to pass attr_spec instead of the members one by one? > + if display_hint in ['ipv4', 'ipv6']: > + ip = ipaddress.ip_address(string) > + if type == 'binary': > + raw = ip.packed > + else: > + raw = int(ip) > + else: I wonder if we should raise in this case? Especially if type is binary passing the string back will just blow up later, right? We could instead rise with a nice clear error message here. > + raw = string > + return raw