From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Shinas Rasheed <srasheed@marvell.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<hgani@marvell.com>, <sedara@marvell.com>, <vimleshk@marvell.com>,
<thaller@redhat.com>, <wizhao@redhat.com>, <kheib@redhat.com>,
<egallen@redhat.com>, <konguyen@redhat.com>, <horms@kernel.org>,
<einstein.xue@synaxg.com>,
Veerasenareddy Burru <vburru@marvell.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 RESEND] octeon_ep: add ndo ops for VFs in PF driver
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 18:33:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241203183318.16f378d1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241202183219.2312114-1-srasheed@marvell.com>
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 10:32:18 -0800 Shinas Rasheed wrote:
> These APIs are needed to support applications that use netlink to get VF
> information from a PF driver.
> + ivi->vf = vf;
> + ether_addr_copy(ivi->mac, oct->vf_info[vf].mac_addr);
> + ivi->spoofchk = true;
> + ivi->linkstate = IFLA_VF_LINK_STATE_ENABLE;
> + ivi->trusted = oct->vf_info[vf].trusted;
> + ivi->max_tx_rate = 10000;
I still feel like this is using the rate limiting API to report fixed
link speed, which is tangential to rate limiting..
Unless the user can set the max_tx_rate why would they want to know
what the limit is at? Ideally reporting rate limit would be done
in a patch set which supports setting it.
> + ivi->min_tx_rate = 0;
No need to set this to 0, AFAIR core initializes to 0.
> /**
> @@ -1560,9 +1601,12 @@ static void octep_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> static int octep_sriov_enable(struct octep_device *oct, int num_vfs)
> {
> struct pci_dev *pdev = oct->pdev;
> - int err;
> + int i, err;
>
> CFG_GET_ACTIVE_VFS(oct->conf) = num_vfs;
> + for (i = 0; i < num_vfs; i++)
> + oct->vf_info[i].trusted = false;
I don't see it ever getting set to true, why track it if it's always
false?
> err = pci_enable_sriov(pdev, num_vfs);
> if (err) {
> dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Failed to enable SRIOV err=%d\n", err);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-04 2:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-02 18:32 [PATCH net-next v3 RESEND] octeon_ep: add ndo ops for VFs in PF driver Shinas Rasheed
2024-12-04 2:33 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-12-05 15:47 ` [EXTERNAL] " Shinas Rasheed
2024-12-06 0:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241203183318.16f378d1@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=egallen@redhat.com \
--cc=einstein.xue@synaxg.com \
--cc=hgani@marvell.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kheib@redhat.com \
--cc=konguyen@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sedara@marvell.com \
--cc=srasheed@marvell.com \
--cc=thaller@redhat.com \
--cc=vburru@marvell.com \
--cc=vimleshk@marvell.com \
--cc=wizhao@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).