From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@novek.ru>,
Frantisek Krenzelok <fkrenzel@redhat.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
Apoorv Kothari <apoorvko@amazon.com>,
Boris Pismenny <borisp@nvidia.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/6] tls: block decryption when a rekey is pending
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 19:47:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241203194701.48e74c8e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <327cb575d15fa5c5379f9c38a5132d78953fb648.1731597571.git.sd@queasysnail.net>
On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 16:50:48 +0100 Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> +static int tls_check_pending_rekey(struct tls_context *ctx, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + const struct tls_msg *tlm = tls_msg(skb);
> + const struct strp_msg *rxm = strp_msg(skb);
> + char hs_type;
> + int err;
> +
> + if (likely(tlm->control != TLS_RECORD_TYPE_HANDSHAKE))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (rxm->full_len < 1)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + err = skb_copy_bits(skb, rxm->offset, &hs_type, 1);
> + if (err < 0)
> + return err;
> +
> + if (hs_type == TLS_HANDSHAKE_KEYUPDATE) {
> + struct tls_sw_context_rx *rx_ctx = ctx->priv_ctx_rx;
> +
> + WRITE_ONCE(rx_ctx->key_update_pending, true);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int tls_rx_one_record(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
> struct tls_decrypt_arg *darg)
> {
> @@ -1739,6 +1769,10 @@ static int tls_rx_one_record(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
> rxm->full_len -= prot->overhead_size;
> tls_advance_record_sn(sk, prot, &tls_ctx->rx);
>
> + err = tls_check_pending_rekey(tls_ctx, darg->skb);
> + if (err < 0)
> + return err;
Sorry if I already asked this, is this 100% safe to error out from here
after we decrypted the record? Normally once we successfully decrypted
and pulled the message header / trailer we always call tls_rx_rec_done()
The only reason the check_pending_rekey() can fail is if the message is
mis-formatted, I wonder if we are better off ignoring mis-formatted
rekeys? User space will see them and break the connection, anyway.
Alternatively - we could add a selftest for this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-04 3:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-14 15:50 [PATCH net-next v4 0/6] tls: implement key updates for TLS1.3 Sabrina Dubroca
2024-11-14 15:50 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/6] tls: block decryption when a rekey is pending Sabrina Dubroca
2024-12-04 3:47 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-12-10 16:16 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2024-12-10 23:33 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-12-05 12:30 ` Parthiban.Veerasooran
2024-11-14 15:50 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/6] tls: implement rekey for TLS1.3 Sabrina Dubroca
2024-12-04 3:58 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-11-14 15:50 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/6] tls: add counters for rekey Sabrina Dubroca
2024-12-04 3:54 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-12-05 11:29 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2024-11-14 15:50 ` [PATCH net-next v4 4/6] docs: tls: document TLS1.3 key updates Sabrina Dubroca
2024-12-04 3:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-12-05 11:06 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2024-12-06 0:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-11-14 15:50 ` [PATCH net-next v4 5/6] selftests: tls: add key_generation argument to tls_crypto_info_init Sabrina Dubroca
2024-11-14 15:50 ` [PATCH net-next v4 6/6] selftests: tls: add rekey tests Sabrina Dubroca
2024-11-19 3:41 ` [PATCH net-next v4 0/6] tls: implement key updates for TLS1.3 Jakub Kicinski
2024-12-03 16:16 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2024-12-04 4:02 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241203194701.48e74c8e@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=apoorvko@amazon.com \
--cc=borisp@nvidia.com \
--cc=fkrenzel@redhat.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=vfedorenko@novek.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).