From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
syzbot+1939f24bdb783e9e43d9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: avoid potential UAF in default_operstate()
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 14:57:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241204125717.6wxa4llwpdhv5hon@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89i+hjGLeGd-wFi+CS=HkrvcHtTso74qJVFLk44cVqid92g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 12:46:11PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 12:41 PM Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> wrote:
> >
> > I meant: linkwatch runs periodically, via linkwatch_event(). Isn't there
> > a chance that linkwatch_event() can run once, immediately after
> > __rtnl_unlock() in netdev_run_todo(), while the netdev is in the
> > NETREG_UNREGISTERING state? Won't that create problems for __dev_get_by_index()
> > too? I guess it depends on when the netns is torn down, which I couldn't find.
>
> I think lweventlist_lock and dev->link_watch_list are supposed to
> synchronize things.
>
> linkwatch_sync_dev() only calls linkwatch_do_dev() if the device was
> atomically unlinked from lweventlist
No, I don't mean calls from linkwatch_sync_dev(). I mean other call
paths towards linkwatch_do_dev(), like for example linkwatch_fire_event() -
carrier down, whatever. Can't these be pending on an unregistering
net_device at the time we run __rtnl_unlock() in netdev_run_todo?
Otherwise, why would netdev_wait_allrefs_any() have a linkwatch_run_queue()
call just later?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-04 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-03 17:09 [PATCH net] net: avoid potential UAF in default_operstate() Eric Dumazet
2024-12-03 17:37 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-12-03 17:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-12-04 11:41 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-12-04 11:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-12-04 12:57 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2024-12-04 13:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-12-04 14:34 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-12-04 14:35 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-12-05 11:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241204125717.6wxa4llwpdhv5hon@skbuf \
--to=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=syzbot+1939f24bdb783e9e43d9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox