From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 950562F32; Fri, 6 Dec 2024 00:47:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733446030; cv=none; b=hCBUVZogzlhIgx31jDdERr3LoMUMpu7809s9E+4cIr8gOls2RX6sFUi26hPl+dVBXVOVfPl3FGUFo5qHVb5cuTPguWxLWKl6zH1SZJqedPz/2qMzNgOd5HBRYm6yHE5PkcapdLGVqxtVQusnyQC3pw34kxhC3+/uSXw0AaB9xw0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733446030; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qTk619EP8BquDWI3RIvDV3o4XR1pfGCPvLu6/s4l0AY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=DXPntNt6U+lM7tI1ykU1auCZ3tSoMf5kDOceymC8v/ft61UOyiaQeD3Qweunm8z5HjAaOR8DV9jbLQZqZQjEdYZMTVRTADLhPDISnLv0oFoy8zduCkqZonyMUvZw4ARhVlYrPj5z2iC75wcsBhQNzRjsIyKki4nBwiRcs8OrcMk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=SAi9e/7M; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="SAi9e/7M" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 874BCC4CED1; Fri, 6 Dec 2024 00:47:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1733446030; bh=qTk619EP8BquDWI3RIvDV3o4XR1pfGCPvLu6/s4l0AY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=SAi9e/7MlKc7iAR11XIPgE/t2nmmfRtA5qBvhR+r0QOwpfNFKv689H+WtkF0NzMVu Eu+ViNh69njOGN4T8eP1X3DwxZdbBq/s3Nrm5q2mpvrjvKf5359QlC1iH+UqBuRlCK 2M2KhknAOEFVx1Vz9DMAPB88EJXKpGPI1nJ8wNQZ5SAKTX/kM94QTEPZNJOH0tPSmf eYGu4JajSKA6LJd4dAfDGGufiNZkwKWCpA9x9jmpK+FLp7t/39RODkPV0DNohOcb70 F78woE/QqBG3075kZt3i/YgW21l+kqwtM3ZKOqZtMHy2jDfq+aaZwjpmanbh36IUwf 3CGmbErfRTipA== Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 16:47:08 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Nikita Yushchenko Cc: Yoshihiro Shimoda , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Geert Uytterhoeven , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michael Dege , Christian Mardmoeller , Dennis Ostermann Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] net: renesas: rswitch: fix leaked pointer on error path Message-ID: <20241205164708.319cbb92@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <9b2607ac-a577-49ca-8106-b82b25723439@cogentembedded.com> References: <20241202134904.3882317-1-nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com> <20241202134904.3882317-3-nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com> <20241204194019.43737f84@kernel.org> <9b2607ac-a577-49ca-8106-b82b25723439@cogentembedded.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 08:46:15 +0500 Nikita Yushchenko wrote: > > I agree with Jake that patches 4 and 5 don't seem like obvious fixes, > > would be great if you could post them as separate series, they need to > > go to a different tree. > > Ok, will repost. > > Shall I use [PATCH net] for all? > Or [PATCH] for fixes and [PATCH net] for improvements? Ideally [PATCH net] for fixes, [PATCH net-next] for improvements. But it's not a big deal as long as they are separated.