netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
Cc: "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
	"Maciej Fijalkowski" <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
	"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@fomichev.me>,
	"Magnus Karlsson" <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
	nex.sw.ncis.osdt.itp.upstreaming@intel.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 09/10] page_pool: allow mixing PPs within one bulk
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 18:40:16 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241205184016.6941f504@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241203173733.3181246-10-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>

Very nice in general, I'll apply the previous 8 but I'd like to offer
some alternatives here..

On Tue,  3 Dec 2024 18:37:32 +0100 Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> +void page_pool_put_netmem_bulk(netmem_ref *data, u32 count)
>  {
> -	int i, bulk_len = 0;
> -	bool allow_direct;
> -	bool in_softirq;
> +	bool allow_direct, in_softirq, again = false;
> +	netmem_ref bulk[XDP_BULK_QUEUE_SIZE];
> +	u32 i, bulk_len, foreign;
> +	struct page_pool *pool;
>  
> -	allow_direct = page_pool_napi_local(pool);
> +again:
> +	pool = NULL;
> +	bulk_len = 0;
> +	foreign = 0;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> -		netmem_ref netmem = netmem_compound_head(data[i]);
> +		struct page_pool *netmem_pp;
> +		netmem_ref netmem;
> +
> +		if (!again) {
> +			netmem = netmem_compound_head(data[i]);
>  
> -		/* It is not the last user for the page frag case */
> -		if (!page_pool_is_last_ref(netmem))
> +			/* It is not the last user for the page frag case */
> +			if (!page_pool_is_last_ref(netmem))
> +				continue;

We check the "again" condition potentially n^2 times, is it written
this way because we expect no mixing? Would it not be fewer cycles
to do a first pass, convert all buffers to heads, filter out all
non-last refs, and delete the "again" check?

Minor benefit is that it removes a few of the long lines so it'd be
feasible to drop the "goto again" as well and just turn this function
into a while (count) loop.

> +		} else {
> +			netmem = data[i];
> +		}
> +
> +		netmem_pp = netmem_get_pp(netmem);

nit: netmem_pp is not a great name. Ain't nothing especially netmem
about it, it's just the _current_ page pool.

> +		if (unlikely(!pool)) {
> +			pool = netmem_pp;
> +			allow_direct = page_pool_napi_local(pool);
> +		} else if (netmem_pp != pool) {
> +			/*
> +			 * If the netmem belongs to a different page_pool, save
> +			 * it for another round after the main loop.
> +			 */
> +			data[foreign++] = netmem;
>  			continue;
> +		}
>  
>  		netmem = __page_pool_put_page(pool, netmem, -1, allow_direct);
>  		/* Approved for bulk recycling in ptr_ring cache */
>  		if (netmem)
> -			data[bulk_len++] = netmem;
> +			bulk[bulk_len++] = netmem;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!bulk_len)

You can invert this condition, and move all the code from here to the
out label into a small helper with just 3 params (pool, bulk, bulk_len).
Naming will be the tricky part but you can save us a bunch of gotos.

> -		return;
> +		goto out;
>  
>  	/* Bulk producer into ptr_ring page_pool cache */
>  	in_softirq = page_pool_producer_lock(pool);
>  	for (i = 0; i < bulk_len; i++) {
> -		if (__ptr_ring_produce(&pool->ring, (__force void *)data[i])) {
> +		if (__ptr_ring_produce(&pool->ring, (__force void *)bulk[i])) {
>  			/* ring full */
>  			recycle_stat_inc(pool, ring_full);
>  			break;
> @@ -893,13 +915,22 @@ void page_pool_put_netmem_bulk(struct page_pool *pool, netmem_ref *data,
>  
>  	/* Hopefully all pages was return into ptr_ring */
>  	if (likely(i == bulk_len))
> -		return;
> +		goto out;
>  
>  	/* ptr_ring cache full, free remaining pages outside producer lock
>  	 * since put_page() with refcnt == 1 can be an expensive operation
>  	 */
>  	for (; i < bulk_len; i++)
> -		page_pool_return_page(pool, data[i]);
> +		page_pool_return_page(pool, bulk[i]);
> +
> +out:
> +	if (!foreign)
> +		return;
> +
> +	count = foreign;
> +	again = true;
> +
> +	goto again;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(page_pool_put_netmem_bulk);

  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-06  2:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-03 17:37 [PATCH net-next v6 00/10] xdp: a fistful of generic changes pt. I Alexander Lobakin
2024-12-03 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next v6 01/10] xsk: align &xdp_buff_xsk harder Alexander Lobakin
2024-12-04 10:27   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-12-03 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next v6 02/10] bpf, xdp: constify some bpf_prog * function arguments Alexander Lobakin
2024-12-03 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next v6 03/10] xdp, xsk: constify read-only arguments of some static inline helpers Alexander Lobakin
2024-12-03 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next v6 04/10] xdp: allow attaching already registered memory model to xdp_rxq_info Alexander Lobakin
2024-12-03 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next v6 05/10] xsk: allow attaching XSk pool via xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model() Alexander Lobakin
2024-12-03 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next v6 06/10] xdp: register system page pool as an XDP memory model Alexander Lobakin
2024-12-03 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next v6 07/10] netmem: add a couple of page helper wrappers Alexander Lobakin
2024-12-04 10:49   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-12-06  4:03   ` Mina Almasry
2024-12-03 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next v6 08/10] page_pool: make page_pool_put_page_bulk() handle array of netmems Alexander Lobakin
2024-12-04 10:50   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-12-06  4:07   ` Mina Almasry
2024-12-03 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next v6 09/10] page_pool: allow mixing PPs within one bulk Alexander Lobakin
2024-12-06  2:40   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-12-06 13:49     ` Alexander Lobakin
2024-12-06 16:20       ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-12-03 17:37 ` [PATCH net-next v6 10/10] xdp: get rid of xdp_frame::mem.id Alexander Lobakin
2024-12-06  7:10 ` [PATCH net-next v6 00/10] xdp: a fistful of generic changes pt. I patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241205184016.6941f504@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nex.sw.ncis.osdt.itp.upstreaming@intel.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).