From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD7BD1AD9F9; Fri, 6 Dec 2024 10:11:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733479874; cv=none; b=SW/zfWf73AL3ye4Nw26ts2Y/gAcr7ylAfdCxK/hYGO0etYstKuKHknvr59YUCzgQHlFBUGJnBVTHfAZX55bKgTSExDI97lAVJGo2/YIT4aKpnrtJkPyz7/TvnFUDI06nyiYoSXqukpK+baUVoA2xWISjpEzJEPS3eiVBdnhfSHk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733479874; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MLNJAgBwRgs2KjM5s4PX7TmimuKXeMg69Vr4tEt3vIU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=tMrt+p/y0SohUU2rnYHT4lfi4bCcFNDVunR/4N63ZuCfHlpaiK4uryM54n3yWzeE+QnksskaX0cJDtJqF2AcIyUHJ8IxB+rSp+4uPXe98jaKIdyg7a3+9XMWvSLOTpMdlXZYY9b7vsqnK4KBu5yMwDzx8Sm5kbum71xfIR6e7iQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=YBP9H2H0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="YBP9H2H0" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A591C4CED1; Fri, 6 Dec 2024 10:11:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1733479873; bh=MLNJAgBwRgs2KjM5s4PX7TmimuKXeMg69Vr4tEt3vIU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=YBP9H2H0tqtGwm1CvEqLxfcBJhulgIHIQU5M+lk2sHOvivaDxLZHUmWH/xKxtoUZJ RM8SdJK9fttmHgrm7fJEgRrFmSHFsXlyuRxfXwoW7qGICZqH0fjniM++fhLaza6mPu GbwBUhJjh6xRpWZU8IaaIJsB80z5GxnuwnMtze36uwqvw4MNjA1k3LqCqRhisG5T/S ibwfIcyBpTJeTbO22kikY5pILlQxYK2DJUJYDR48wjI/DvSmjXhQ+JLzPv/2K/pTlx XdRinRuf57Iq8dfUeAJU3Kz3Kbmd0fD9xHaJJZ88Xe5Ja8WIzRNN7vLHwQJJqL6UCF TAdA5nXM/N6ZQ== Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 10:11:09 +0000 From: Simon Horman To: Wei Fang Cc: claudiu.manoil@nxp.com, vladimir.oltean@nxp.com, xiaoning.wang@nxp.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, frank.li@nxp.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 RESEND net-next 3/5] net: enetc: update max chained Tx BD number for i.MX95 ENETC Message-ID: <20241206101109.GK2581@kernel.org> References: <20241204052932.112446-1-wei.fang@nxp.com> <20241204052932.112446-4-wei.fang@nxp.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241204052932.112446-4-wei.fang@nxp.com> On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 01:29:30PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote: > The max chained Tx BDs of latest ENETC (i.MX95 ENETC, rev 4.1) has been > increased to 63, but since the range of MAX_SKB_FRAGS is 17~45, so for > i.MX95 ENETC and later revision, it is better to set ENETC4_MAX_SKB_FRAGS > to MAX_SKB_FRAGS. > > In addition, add max_frags in struct enetc_drvdata to indicate the max > chained BDs supported by device. Because the max number of chained BDs > supported by LS1028A and i.MX95 ENETC is different. > > Signed-off-by: Wei Fang > Reviewed-by: Frank Li > Reviewed-by: Claudiu Manoil Reviewed-by: Simon Horman