From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 3/3] rtnetlink: remove pad field in ndo_fdb_dump_context
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2024 16:22:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241207162248.18536-4-edumazet@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241207162248.18536-1-edumazet@google.com>
I chose to remove this field in a separate patch to ease
potential bisection, in case one ndo_fdb_dump() is still
using the old way (cb->args[2] instead of ctx->fdb_idx)
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
---
include/linux/rtnetlink.h | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rtnetlink.h b/include/linux/rtnetlink.h
index 2b17d7eebd92342e472b9eb3b2ade84bc8ae2e94..af668b79eb757c86970b2455d9d820c902699a13 100644
--- a/include/linux/rtnetlink.h
+++ b/include/linux/rtnetlink.h
@@ -181,7 +181,6 @@ void rtnl_kfree_skbs(struct sk_buff *head, struct sk_buff *tail);
/* Shared by rtnl_fdb_dump() and various ndo_fdb_dump() helpers. */
struct ndo_fdb_dump_context {
unsigned long ifindex;
- unsigned long pad;
unsigned long fdb_idx;
};
--
2.47.0.338.g60cca15819-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-07 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-07 16:22 [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: prepare for removal of net->dev_index_head Eric Dumazet
2024-12-07 16:22 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] rtnetlink: add ndo_fdb_dump_context Eric Dumazet
2024-12-08 17:57 ` Ido Schimmel
2024-12-09 9:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-12-09 5:48 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-12-07 16:22 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] rtnetlink: switch rtnl_fdb_dump() to for_each_netdev_dump() Eric Dumazet
2024-12-08 18:15 ` Ido Schimmel
2024-12-09 5:52 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-12-07 16:22 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2024-12-08 18:20 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] rtnetlink: remove pad field in ndo_fdb_dump_context Ido Schimmel
2024-12-09 5:54 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241207162248.18536-4-edumazet@google.com \
--to=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).