From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6767217BA5; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 21:10:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733778635; cv=none; b=ABeODbmjvacUL5nUZbsK5SclzBYDzVJRpQj2fdwKYOUmsC/P1UBn/w6bEoHN1aPw3R1m7gtuoVotcFZ7cozyZa6OalI9tU35OaGwWSJT8mZkObe5JzPjdzkno+WckyWjDl2AZKAJDK7Yaavrzodne7su/yDyb3Ub2RpLVaGCv6E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733778635; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FUhkHZk6FYp5UJ7j0cMnzM45fsDiUM3JrC0068ztZ+c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=gGrpbUkzGW7NV7ythFPKe/VtftIwktxPMEDzLYm0w1Zqyju91nw8qYSQOU+dGLC+i/itl+/AbJVMAsiZhF8l+9qLdxyS84ckgqR6EJwg6BMz9vty13lPwg2XfKqqer2j7ZP3VASqCKUtmn6reb8FoWUAJJFDtEg2zoUhupRtAl4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=uW+EdXEE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="uW+EdXEE" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D132C4CED1; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 21:10:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1733778633; bh=FUhkHZk6FYp5UJ7j0cMnzM45fsDiUM3JrC0068ztZ+c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=uW+EdXEE4Lh3ufyYxGNy5xUlDNgyyA/fG44h37lO4HY2b8CrSn6AxBzjZLw0Idq1y Jeeo2M/MGratPZHc4ozQObKhJ6R2E9uawMTmDmmxy8/76BzAPSRYoqbdF6QKTadudz iXOVPGa1+fsvSzegA8noRlvXuvKjwkerAQhX/zKs+q1b0tfStx0qLG0hZqEKViEIbG h/psW0ZIQE1cX/CES6on7/qRt7EpwaeQlXXvSHxWNkK0f2hv0jJF2J60mLDBw1Pqw1 mHTTKk5LCsXXfSQQsyGd6YouENjHqPNYQ5TtXfr2bicTgHpYzpDvPnqexALiU6ZUIW NYf1574GlwMmw== Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 13:10:32 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Christopher Ferris Cc: Nick Desaulniers , Kees Cook , "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , Michael Chan , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Potnuri Bharat Teja , Christian Benvenuti , Satish Kharat , Manish Chopra , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, android-llvm-dev@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2][next] UAPI: ethtool: Use __struct_group() in struct ethtool_link_settings Message-ID: <20241209131032.6af473f4@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <9e9fb0bd72e5ba1e916acbb4995b1e358b86a689.1730238285.git.gustavoars@kernel.org> <20241109100213.262a2fa0@kernel.org> <55d62419-3a0c-4f26-a260-06cf2dc44ec1@embeddedor.com> <202411151215.B56D49E36@keescook> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:59:40 -0800 Christopher Ferris wrote: > It looks like the way this was fixed in the ethtool.h uapi header was to > revert the usage of __struct_group. Should something similar happen for > pkt_cls.h? Or would it be easier to simply remove the usage of the TAG in > the _struct_group macro? Just to state it explicitly - are you running into a compilation issue with existing user space after updating pkt_cls.h?