Re: [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] landlock: Add note about errors consistency in documentation

["Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>]

On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 07:04:53PM +0800, Mikhail Ivanov wrote:
> Add recommendation to specify Landlock first in CONFIG_LSM list, so user
> can have better LSM errors consistency provided by Landlock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Ivanov <ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst
> index bb7480a05e2c..0db5eee9bffa 100644
> --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst
> @@ -610,7 +610,8 @@ time as the other security modules.  The list of security modules enabled by
>  default is set with ``CONFIG_LSM``.  The kernel configuration should then
>  contains ``CONFIG_LSM=landlock,[...]`` with ``[...]``  as the list of other
>  potentially useful security modules for the running system (see the
> -``CONFIG_LSM`` help).
> +``CONFIG_LSM`` help). It is recommended to specify Landlock first of all other
> +modules in CONFIG_LSM list since it provides better errors consistency.

This is partially correct because Landlock may not block anything
whereas another LSM could deny a network action, with potentially a
wrong error code.  I don't think this patch is worth it, especially
because other LSMs have bugs that should be fixed.

>  
>  Boot time configuration
>  -----------------------
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
>