[PATCH net-next v3 0/2] net/smc: Two features for smc-r

[PATCH net-next v3 0/2] net/smc: Two features for smc-r

[Guangguan Wang]

v2 -> v3:
(https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241202125203.48821-1-guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com/)
Patch #1 add 'Reviewed-by' tag.
Patch #2 remove the condition when IPV6 is disabled, and change the
condition to an easier understanding way. Correct the typo and add
'Reviewed-by' tag.

v1 -> v2:
Patch #2 fix build error reported by kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>.
https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411282154.DjX7ilwF-lkp@intel.com/

Guangguan Wang (2):
  net/smc: support SMC-R V2 for rdma devices with max_recv_sge equals to
    1
  net/smc: support ipv4 mapped ipv6 addr client for smc-r v2

 net/smc/af_smc.c   |  5 ++++-
 net/smc/smc_core.c |  5 +++++
 net/smc/smc_core.h | 11 ++++++++++-
 net/smc/smc_ib.c   |  3 +--
 net/smc/smc_llc.c  | 21 +++++++++++++++------
 net/smc/smc_wr.c   | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 6 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

-- 
2.24.3 (Apple Git-128)

[PATCH net-next v3 1/2] net/smc: support SMC-R V2 for rdma devices with max_recv_sge equals to 1

[Guangguan Wang]

For SMC-R V2, llc msg can be larger than SMC_WR_BUF_SIZE, thus every
recv wr has 2 sges, the first sge with length SMC_WR_BUF_SIZE is for
V1/V2 compatible llc/cdc msg, and the second sge with length
SMC_WR_BUF_V2_SIZE-SMC_WR_TX_SIZE is for V2 specific llc msg, like
SMC_LLC_DELETE_RKEY and SMC_LLC_ADD_LINK for SMC-R V2. The memory
buffer in the second sge is shared by all recv wr in one link and
all link in one lgr for saving memory usage purpose.

But not all RDMA devices with max_recv_sge greater than 1. Thus SMC-R
V2 can not support on such RDMA devices and SMC_CLC_DECL_INTERR fallback
happens because of the failure of create qp.

This patch introduce the support for SMC-R V2 on RDMA devices with
max_recv_sge equals to 1. Every recv wr has only one sge with individual
buffer whose size is SMC_WR_BUF_V2_SIZE once the RDMA device's max_recv_sge
equals to 1. It may use more memory, but it is better than
SMC_CLC_DECL_INTERR fallback.

Co-developed-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>
---
 net/smc/smc_core.c |  5 +++++
 net/smc/smc_core.h | 11 ++++++++++-
 net/smc/smc_ib.c   |  3 +--
 net/smc/smc_llc.c  | 21 +++++++++++++++------
 net/smc/smc_wr.c   | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 5 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.c b/net/smc/smc_core.c
index 500952c2e67b..ede4d5f3111b 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_core.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_core.c
@@ -795,9 +795,14 @@ int smcr_link_init(struct smc_link_group *lgr, struct smc_link *lnk,
 	if (lgr->smc_version == SMC_V2) {
 		lnk->smcibdev = ini->smcrv2.ib_dev_v2;
 		lnk->ibport = ini->smcrv2.ib_port_v2;
+		lnk->wr_rx_sge_cnt = lnk->smcibdev->ibdev->attrs.max_recv_sge < 2 ? 1 : 2;
+		lnk->wr_rx_buflen = smc_link_shared_v2_rxbuf(lnk) ?
+			SMC_WR_BUF_SIZE : SMC_WR_BUF_V2_SIZE;
 	} else {
 		lnk->smcibdev = ini->ib_dev;
 		lnk->ibport = ini->ib_port;
+		lnk->wr_rx_sge_cnt = 1;
+		lnk->wr_rx_buflen = SMC_WR_BUF_SIZE;
 	}
 	get_device(&lnk->smcibdev->ibdev->dev);
 	atomic_inc(&lnk->smcibdev->lnk_cnt);
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.h b/net/smc/smc_core.h
index 69b54ecd6503..48a1b1dcb576 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_core.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc_core.h
@@ -122,10 +122,14 @@ struct smc_link {
 	} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
 	struct completion	tx_ref_comp;
 
-	struct smc_wr_buf	*wr_rx_bufs;	/* WR recv payload buffers */
+	u8			*wr_rx_bufs;	/* WR recv payload buffers */
 	struct ib_recv_wr	*wr_rx_ibs;	/* WR recv meta data */
 	struct ib_sge		*wr_rx_sges;	/* WR recv scatter meta data */
 	/* above three vectors have wr_rx_cnt elements and use the same index */
+	int			wr_rx_sge_cnt; /* rx sge, V1 is 1, V2 is either 2 or 1 */
+	int			wr_rx_buflen;	/* buffer len for the first sge, len for the
+						 * second sge is lgr shared if rx sge is 2.
+						 */
 	dma_addr_t		wr_rx_dma_addr;	/* DMA address of wr_rx_bufs */
 	dma_addr_t		wr_rx_v2_dma_addr; /* DMA address of v2 rx buf*/
 	u64			wr_rx_id;	/* seq # of last recv WR */
@@ -506,6 +510,11 @@ static inline bool smc_link_active(struct smc_link *lnk)
 	return lnk->state == SMC_LNK_ACTIVE;
 }
 
+static inline bool smc_link_shared_v2_rxbuf(struct smc_link *lnk)
+{
+	return lnk->wr_rx_sge_cnt > 1;
+}
+
 static inline void smc_gid_be16_convert(__u8 *buf, u8 *gid_raw)
 {
 	sprintf(buf, "%04x:%04x:%04x:%04x:%04x:%04x:%04x:%04x",
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_ib.c b/net/smc/smc_ib.c
index 9c563cdbea90..53828833a3f7 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_ib.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_ib.c
@@ -662,7 +662,6 @@ void smc_ib_destroy_queue_pair(struct smc_link *lnk)
 /* create a queue pair within the protection domain for a link */
 int smc_ib_create_queue_pair(struct smc_link *lnk)
 {
-	int sges_per_buf = (lnk->lgr->smc_version == SMC_V2) ? 2 : 1;
 	struct ib_qp_init_attr qp_attr = {
 		.event_handler = smc_ib_qp_event_handler,
 		.qp_context = lnk,
@@ -676,7 +675,7 @@ int smc_ib_create_queue_pair(struct smc_link *lnk)
 			.max_send_wr = SMC_WR_BUF_CNT * 3,
 			.max_recv_wr = SMC_WR_BUF_CNT * 3,
 			.max_send_sge = SMC_IB_MAX_SEND_SGE,
-			.max_recv_sge = sges_per_buf,
+			.max_recv_sge = lnk->wr_rx_sge_cnt,
 			.max_inline_data = 0,
 		},
 		.sq_sig_type = IB_SIGNAL_REQ_WR,
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_llc.c b/net/smc/smc_llc.c
index 018ce8133b02..f865c58c3aa7 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_llc.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_llc.c
@@ -997,13 +997,14 @@ static int smc_llc_cli_conf_link(struct smc_link *link,
 }
 
 static void smc_llc_save_add_link_rkeys(struct smc_link *link,
-					struct smc_link *link_new)
+					struct smc_link *link_new,
+					u8 *llc_msg)
 {
 	struct smc_llc_msg_add_link_v2_ext *ext;
 	struct smc_link_group *lgr = link->lgr;
 	int max, i;
 
-	ext = (struct smc_llc_msg_add_link_v2_ext *)((u8 *)lgr->wr_rx_buf_v2 +
+	ext = (struct smc_llc_msg_add_link_v2_ext *)(llc_msg +
 						     SMC_WR_TX_SIZE);
 	max = min_t(u8, ext->num_rkeys, SMC_LLC_RKEYS_PER_MSG_V2);
 	down_write(&lgr->rmbs_lock);
@@ -1098,7 +1099,9 @@ int smc_llc_cli_add_link(struct smc_link *link, struct smc_llc_qentry *qentry)
 	if (rc)
 		goto out_clear_lnk;
 	if (lgr->smc_version == SMC_V2) {
-		smc_llc_save_add_link_rkeys(link, lnk_new);
+		u8 *llc_msg = smc_link_shared_v2_rxbuf(link) ?
+			(u8 *)lgr->wr_rx_buf_v2 : (u8 *)llc;
+		smc_llc_save_add_link_rkeys(link, lnk_new, llc_msg);
 	} else {
 		rc = smc_llc_cli_rkey_exchange(link, lnk_new);
 		if (rc) {
@@ -1498,7 +1501,9 @@ int smc_llc_srv_add_link(struct smc_link *link,
 	if (rc)
 		goto out_err;
 	if (lgr->smc_version == SMC_V2) {
-		smc_llc_save_add_link_rkeys(link, link_new);
+		u8 *llc_msg = smc_link_shared_v2_rxbuf(link) ?
+			(u8 *)lgr->wr_rx_buf_v2 : (u8 *)add_llc;
+		smc_llc_save_add_link_rkeys(link, link_new, llc_msg);
 	} else {
 		rc = smc_llc_srv_rkey_exchange(link, link_new);
 		if (rc)
@@ -1807,8 +1812,12 @@ static void smc_llc_rmt_delete_rkey(struct smc_link_group *lgr)
 	if (lgr->smc_version == SMC_V2) {
 		struct smc_llc_msg_delete_rkey_v2 *llcv2;
 
-		memcpy(lgr->wr_rx_buf_v2, llc, sizeof(*llc));
-		llcv2 = (struct smc_llc_msg_delete_rkey_v2 *)lgr->wr_rx_buf_v2;
+		if (smc_link_shared_v2_rxbuf(link)) {
+			memcpy(lgr->wr_rx_buf_v2, llc, sizeof(*llc));
+			llcv2 = (struct smc_llc_msg_delete_rkey_v2 *)lgr->wr_rx_buf_v2;
+		} else {
+			llcv2 = (struct smc_llc_msg_delete_rkey_v2 *)llc;
+		}
 		llcv2->num_inval_rkeys = 0;
 
 		max = min_t(u8, llcv2->num_rkeys, SMC_LLC_RKEYS_PER_MSG_V2);
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_wr.c b/net/smc/smc_wr.c
index 994c0cd4fddb..b04a21b8c511 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_wr.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_wr.c
@@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ static inline void smc_wr_rx_demultiplex(struct ib_wc *wc)
 		return; /* short message */
 	temp_wr_id = wc->wr_id;
 	index = do_div(temp_wr_id, link->wr_rx_cnt);
-	wr_rx = (struct smc_wr_rx_hdr *)&link->wr_rx_bufs[index];
+	wr_rx = (struct smc_wr_rx_hdr *)(link->wr_rx_bufs + index * link->wr_rx_buflen);
 	hash_for_each_possible(smc_wr_rx_hash, handler, list, wr_rx->type) {
 		if (handler->type == wr_rx->type)
 			handler->handler(wc, wr_rx);
@@ -555,7 +555,6 @@ void smc_wr_remember_qp_attr(struct smc_link *lnk)
 
 static void smc_wr_init_sge(struct smc_link *lnk)
 {
-	int sges_per_buf = (lnk->lgr->smc_version == SMC_V2) ? 2 : 1;
 	bool send_inline = (lnk->qp_attr.cap.max_inline_data > SMC_WR_TX_SIZE);
 	u32 i;
 
@@ -608,13 +607,14 @@ static void smc_wr_init_sge(struct smc_link *lnk)
 	 * the larger spillover buffer, allowing easy data mapping.
 	 */
 	for (i = 0; i < lnk->wr_rx_cnt; i++) {
-		int x = i * sges_per_buf;
+		int x = i * lnk->wr_rx_sge_cnt;
 
 		lnk->wr_rx_sges[x].addr =
-			lnk->wr_rx_dma_addr + i * SMC_WR_BUF_SIZE;
-		lnk->wr_rx_sges[x].length = SMC_WR_TX_SIZE;
+			lnk->wr_rx_dma_addr + i * lnk->wr_rx_buflen;
+		lnk->wr_rx_sges[x].length = smc_link_shared_v2_rxbuf(lnk) ?
+			SMC_WR_TX_SIZE : lnk->wr_rx_buflen;
 		lnk->wr_rx_sges[x].lkey = lnk->roce_pd->local_dma_lkey;
-		if (lnk->lgr->smc_version == SMC_V2) {
+		if (lnk->lgr->smc_version == SMC_V2 && smc_link_shared_v2_rxbuf(lnk)) {
 			lnk->wr_rx_sges[x + 1].addr =
 					lnk->wr_rx_v2_dma_addr + SMC_WR_TX_SIZE;
 			lnk->wr_rx_sges[x + 1].length =
@@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ static void smc_wr_init_sge(struct smc_link *lnk)
 		}
 		lnk->wr_rx_ibs[i].next = NULL;
 		lnk->wr_rx_ibs[i].sg_list = &lnk->wr_rx_sges[x];
-		lnk->wr_rx_ibs[i].num_sge = sges_per_buf;
+		lnk->wr_rx_ibs[i].num_sge = lnk->wr_rx_sge_cnt;
 	}
 	lnk->wr_reg.wr.next = NULL;
 	lnk->wr_reg.wr.num_sge = 0;
@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ void smc_wr_free_link(struct smc_link *lnk)
 
 	if (lnk->wr_rx_dma_addr) {
 		ib_dma_unmap_single(ibdev, lnk->wr_rx_dma_addr,
-				    SMC_WR_BUF_SIZE * lnk->wr_rx_cnt,
+				    lnk->wr_rx_buflen * lnk->wr_rx_cnt,
 				    DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
 		lnk->wr_rx_dma_addr = 0;
 	}
@@ -740,13 +740,11 @@ int smc_wr_alloc_lgr_mem(struct smc_link_group *lgr)
 
 int smc_wr_alloc_link_mem(struct smc_link *link)
 {
-	int sges_per_buf = link->lgr->smc_version == SMC_V2 ? 2 : 1;
-
 	/* allocate link related memory */
 	link->wr_tx_bufs = kcalloc(SMC_WR_BUF_CNT, SMC_WR_BUF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!link->wr_tx_bufs)
 		goto no_mem;
-	link->wr_rx_bufs = kcalloc(SMC_WR_BUF_CNT * 3, SMC_WR_BUF_SIZE,
+	link->wr_rx_bufs = kcalloc(SMC_WR_BUF_CNT * 3, link->wr_rx_buflen,
 				   GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!link->wr_rx_bufs)
 		goto no_mem_wr_tx_bufs;
@@ -774,7 +772,7 @@ int smc_wr_alloc_link_mem(struct smc_link *link)
 	if (!link->wr_tx_sges)
 		goto no_mem_wr_tx_rdma_sges;
 	link->wr_rx_sges = kcalloc(SMC_WR_BUF_CNT * 3,
-				   sizeof(link->wr_rx_sges[0]) * sges_per_buf,
+				   sizeof(link->wr_rx_sges[0]) * link->wr_rx_sge_cnt,
 				   GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!link->wr_rx_sges)
 		goto no_mem_wr_tx_sges;
@@ -872,7 +870,7 @@ int smc_wr_create_link(struct smc_link *lnk)
 	smc_wr_tx_set_wr_id(&lnk->wr_tx_id, 0);
 	lnk->wr_rx_id = 0;
 	lnk->wr_rx_dma_addr = ib_dma_map_single(
-		ibdev, lnk->wr_rx_bufs,	SMC_WR_BUF_SIZE * lnk->wr_rx_cnt,
+		ibdev, lnk->wr_rx_bufs,	lnk->wr_rx_buflen * lnk->wr_rx_cnt,
 		DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
 	if (ib_dma_mapping_error(ibdev, lnk->wr_rx_dma_addr)) {
 		lnk->wr_rx_dma_addr = 0;
@@ -880,13 +878,15 @@ int smc_wr_create_link(struct smc_link *lnk)
 		goto out;
 	}
 	if (lnk->lgr->smc_version == SMC_V2) {
-		lnk->wr_rx_v2_dma_addr = ib_dma_map_single(ibdev,
-			lnk->lgr->wr_rx_buf_v2, SMC_WR_BUF_V2_SIZE,
-			DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
-		if (ib_dma_mapping_error(ibdev, lnk->wr_rx_v2_dma_addr)) {
-			lnk->wr_rx_v2_dma_addr = 0;
-			rc = -EIO;
-			goto dma_unmap;
+		if (smc_link_shared_v2_rxbuf(lnk)) {
+			lnk->wr_rx_v2_dma_addr =
+				ib_dma_map_single(ibdev, lnk->lgr->wr_rx_buf_v2,
+						  SMC_WR_BUF_V2_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
+			if (ib_dma_mapping_error(ibdev, lnk->wr_rx_v2_dma_addr)) {
+				lnk->wr_rx_v2_dma_addr = 0;
+				rc = -EIO;
+				goto dma_unmap;
+			}
 		}
 		lnk->wr_tx_v2_dma_addr = ib_dma_map_single(ibdev,
 			lnk->lgr->wr_tx_buf_v2, SMC_WR_BUF_V2_SIZE,
@@ -935,7 +935,7 @@ int smc_wr_create_link(struct smc_link *lnk)
 		lnk->wr_tx_v2_dma_addr = 0;
 	}
 	ib_dma_unmap_single(ibdev, lnk->wr_rx_dma_addr,
-			    SMC_WR_BUF_SIZE * lnk->wr_rx_cnt,
+			    lnk->wr_rx_buflen * lnk->wr_rx_cnt,
 			    DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
 	lnk->wr_rx_dma_addr = 0;
 out:
-- 
2.24.3 (Apple Git-128)

[PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net/smc: support ipv4 mapped ipv6 addr client for smc-r v2

[Guangguan Wang]

AF_INET6 is not supported for smc-r v2 client before, even if the
ipv6 addr is ipv4 mapped. Thus, when using AF_INET6, smc-r connection
will fallback to tcp, especially for java applications running smc-r.
This patch support ipv4 mapped ipv6 addr client for smc-r v2. Clients
using real global ipv6 addr is still not supported yet.

Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>
---
 net/smc/af_smc.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index 9d76e902fd77..c3f9c0457418 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -1116,7 +1116,10 @@ static int smc_find_proposal_devices(struct smc_sock *smc,
 	ini->check_smcrv2 = true;
 	ini->smcrv2.saddr = smc->clcsock->sk->sk_rcv_saddr;
 	if (!(ini->smcr_version & SMC_V2) ||
-	    smc->clcsock->sk->sk_family != AF_INET ||
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
+	    (smc->clcsock->sk->sk_family == AF_INET6 &&
+	     !ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&smc->clcsock->sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr)) ||
+#endif
 	    !smc_clc_ueid_count() ||
 	    smc_find_rdma_device(smc, ini))
 		ini->smcr_version &= ~SMC_V2;
-- 
2.24.3 (Apple Git-128)

Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net/smc: support ipv4 mapped ipv6 addr client for smc-r v2

[Wenjia Zhang]

On 09.12.24 14:06, Guangguan Wang wrote:
> AF_INET6 is not supported for smc-r v2 client before, even if the
> ipv6 addr is ipv4 mapped. Thus, when using AF_INET6, smc-r connection
> will fallback to tcp, especially for java applications running smc-r.
> This patch support ipv4 mapped ipv6 addr client for smc-r v2. Clients
> using real global ipv6 addr is still not supported yet.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   net/smc/af_smc.c | 5 ++++-
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> index 9d76e902fd77..c3f9c0457418 100644
> --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
> +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> @@ -1116,7 +1116,10 @@ static int smc_find_proposal_devices(struct smc_sock *smc,
>   	ini->check_smcrv2 = true;
>   	ini->smcrv2.saddr = smc->clcsock->sk->sk_rcv_saddr;
>   	if (!(ini->smcr_version & SMC_V2) ||
> -	    smc->clcsock->sk->sk_family != AF_INET ||
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> +	    (smc->clcsock->sk->sk_family == AF_INET6 &&
> +	     !ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&smc->clcsock->sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr)) ||
> +#endif
>   	    !smc_clc_ueid_count() ||
>   	    smc_find_rdma_device(smc, ini))
>   		ini->smcr_version &= ~SMC_V2;

@Guangguan, I think Halil's point is valid, and we need to verify if 
checking on saddr is sufficient before this patch is applied. i.e. what 
about one peer with ipv4 mapped ipv6 communicates with another peer with 
a real ipv6 address? Is it possible? If yes, would SMCRv2 be used? I 
still haven't thought much on this yet, but it is worth to verify. Maybe 
you already have the answer?

@Jakub, could you please give us some more time to verify the issue 
mentioned above?

Thanks,
Wenjia

Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net/smc: support ipv4 mapped ipv6 addr client for smc-r v2

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 15:10:56 +0100 Wenjia Zhang wrote:
> @Jakub, could you please give us some more time to verify the issue 
> mentioned above?

No problem. I'll marked it as Awaiting upstream, please repost when
ready. This is our usual process when maintainers of a subsystem need
more time or need to do validation before we merge.
-- 
pw-bot: au

Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net/smc: support ipv4 mapped ipv6 addr client for smc-r v2

[Guangguan Wang]

On 2024/12/9 22:10, Wenjia Zhang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 09.12.24 14:06, Guangguan Wang wrote:
>> AF_INET6 is not supported for smc-r v2 client before, even if the
>> ipv6 addr is ipv4 mapped. Thus, when using AF_INET6, smc-r connection
>> will fallback to tcp, especially for java applications running smc-r.
>> This patch support ipv4 mapped ipv6 addr client for smc-r v2. Clients
>> using real global ipv6 addr is still not supported yet.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
>> Reviewed-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   net/smc/af_smc.c | 5 ++++-
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
>> index 9d76e902fd77..c3f9c0457418 100644
>> --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
>> +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
>> @@ -1116,7 +1116,10 @@ static int smc_find_proposal_devices(struct smc_sock *smc,
>>       ini->check_smcrv2 = true;
>>       ini->smcrv2.saddr = smc->clcsock->sk->sk_rcv_saddr;
>>       if (!(ini->smcr_version & SMC_V2) ||
>> -        smc->clcsock->sk->sk_family != AF_INET ||
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
>> +        (smc->clcsock->sk->sk_family == AF_INET6 &&
>> +         !ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&smc->clcsock->sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr)) ||
>> +#endif
>>           !smc_clc_ueid_count() ||
>>           smc_find_rdma_device(smc, ini))
>>           ini->smcr_version &= ~SMC_V2;
> 
> @Guangguan, I think Halil's point is valid, and we need to verify if checking on saddr is sufficient before this patch is applied. i.e. what about one peer with ipv4 mapped ipv6 communicates with another peer with a real ipv6 address? Is it possible? If yes, would SMCRv2 be used? I still haven't thought much on this yet, but it is worth to verify. Maybe you already have the answer?

Hi, Wenjia

I have replied the answer to the thread of v2 patch(https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/58075d86-b43a-4d58-bf64-c29418f99143@linux.alibaba.com/)

If there are still any doubts or any other points to clarification, please let me know.

Thanks,
Guangguan Wang

> 
> @Jakub, could you please give us some more time to verify the issue mentioned above?
> 
> Thanks,
> Wenjia

Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net/smc: support ipv4 mapped ipv6 addr client for smc-r v2

[Halil Pasic]

On Mon,  9 Dec 2024 21:06:49 +0800
Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:

> AF_INET6 is not supported for smc-r v2 client before, even if the
> ipv6 addr is ipv4 mapped. Thus, when using AF_INET6, smc-r connection
> will fallback to tcp, especially for java applications running smc-r.
> This patch support ipv4 mapped ipv6 addr client for smc-r v2. Clients
> using real global ipv6 addr is still not supported yet.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>

Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net/smc: support ipv4 mapped ipv6 addr client for smc-r v2

[Wenjia Zhang]

On 10.12.24 00:43, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 15:10:56 +0100 Wenjia Zhang wrote:
>> @Jakub, could you please give us some more time to verify the issue
>> mentioned above?
> 
> No problem. I'll marked it as Awaiting upstream, please repost when
> ready. This is our usual process when maintainers of a subsystem need
> more time or need to do validation before we merge.
@Guanguan, I saw your answer and the tests result, thank you for the 
effort! It is totally fine to me now to let it go upstream.

@Jakub, thank you for giving us more time! It's verified now. I think 
they can be applied:-)

Thanks,
Wenjia