From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FEB542A95 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:50:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733878228; cv=none; b=Z6aJ75MtM+C2iS+BZFScY87TFQEenu3zVMHTleiFShtNsCzYtdQmss1WbiKghiNPFxAPBvDycG9Zq/Ge2A81Fkpi1zHdkB/8DAa9uuafVYdM9yETkeJU4yW7rVc0+anlL/MSgPNEGrwY0FlrAQESRVN9nnuCucbcU5pVfukctTw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733878228; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EZycgxuD5reE9DtbJIwv3u2ZKivLdMoidVvm/ottO2A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Nv4Vd4eWKMHM7l92CgMoWPvo/1aVIMgRmpvrLL4q8+dIlZIQ8RbA8LS2tUdwEsBGVGzoo1P6bm5G9oru99aYcG78sPSNqV+6+AwTtxh2Y9tAnSipJjZK4kamdOpEbqmJoxeRuCz6/eDSKNy/z92PbG+sib+PgLuQ2Uw3/ee/Z/o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=F2VMDjSV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="F2VMDjSV" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 19BF2C4CEDE; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:50:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1733878225; bh=EZycgxuD5reE9DtbJIwv3u2ZKivLdMoidVvm/ottO2A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=F2VMDjSVvX2H6pa2LxUGmP3BD0ebP4T+lZTuHj2sEH03pQziU/I9BwgSg/gsS09fu h9covyZOoW4fdXLUwl1SgBQEC8qeZ2qXZPPdYUzNr5Wk6+fVUyyzYER2ybe+ybKLEG DSWCb2TUBGKGp1H7wL5+B9Ieb6sQWVyye9klUXqs9QmMVSTg9yyk/EVTaXMYEkmYUy xlPfMLpAW1j5Zv8QUKKB34xkz9t6LcmoOjPGqFSHjfovQQS6LRKyg1ha7TuyA3twx1 RpyI9f0LDjJObHuxH8gUNd103Jf1lHEkr+pjlwH2VwQnAbrilvvFWK5loE+OjeKCjg cTujYUYDRCTVg== Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 16:50:24 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Yuyang Huang Cc: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , David Ahern , roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, jiri@resnulli.us, stephen@networkplumber.org, jimictw@google.com, prohr@google.com, liuhangbin@gmail.com, nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, andrew@lunn.ch, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Maciej =?UTF-8?B?xbtlbmN6eWtvd3NraQ==?= , Lorenzo Colitti , Patrick Ruddy Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next, v5] netlink: add IGMP/MLD join/leave notifications Message-ID: <20241210165024.07baa835@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20241206041025.37231-1-yuyanghuang@google.com> <20241209182549.271ede3a@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 12:19:11 +0900 Yuyang Huang wrote: > >u8 scope =3D RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE; > >struct nlmsghdr *nlh; > >if (ipv6_addr_scope(&ifmca->mca_addr) & IFA_SITE) =20 > scope =3D RT_SCOPE_SITE; >=20 > Is it acceptable, or should I update the old logic to always set > =E2=80=98RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE=E2=80=99? TBH I'm not an expert on IPv6 address scopes, why do we want to ignore it now? Some commit or RFC we can refer to? Perhaps you could add a new member to inet6_fill_args to force the scope to always be set to universe?