From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE21413FEE for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2024 01:38:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734140311; cv=none; b=Yn/nGnoabE1nRgbZdhctMapMZ8CiAloJ1cMnThovtRhaKZQOvBP3zmh8y6DABC2D/KjYG3i/yaqQN5+lTvVAxyzdH2GyjoNObO+0xu/AACNGEK26/JQQvPSQq20pCDwx9NJHx2+HL6I2yGFURVVu2xsMOjHDHhkjgkDbYRCEOt0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734140311; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wGD3MH2JDSJlPpCEuz5OFoxPd3WwE7Rmej7l4xjxr3w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=INxbKAHDdq/IgLUxxH/1RkhWMa7wzvb5IlPbOz3Fp+Io6eYr7QAphe35NBvanDD2Q9O4Q4+UYvK9USN5nZjc72UxdHLTcAEEdhQuY0b0am02mOTTT4A+dnty2wXiK4tJEYTrlnWqnkr7yc7UgVRagVk5G3dxSOsq20q5BL3cqfI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=KwNuE5Kh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="KwNuE5Kh" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7EB33C4CED0; Sat, 14 Dec 2024 01:38:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1734140310; bh=wGD3MH2JDSJlPpCEuz5OFoxPd3WwE7Rmej7l4xjxr3w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KwNuE5Khw9ab4IThZrPR+JddbQ1fEJApII1lLyqECMTGNXCwZhGjOuB3w/VE4xLrI 2CrHN3+mo1/1RHha73pgjkYZyP2G2NssgdT0vWQ1M0Tf0Pf53BPvqqJQ9nVCP9EDsj BShkLy/aJv4q3N/JHOSXYwFD6kY9216hnq3qHjGk3WK7z2J4tZa3VE+demV3Lodg/+ 9oe91T34gqNVi/mSQzHvl3N7yBYdkSCFXNimUIVkjG2MtHKIQnMf675CTwuIHYjC1Z 9xb5NGiM/t8c1OdLFOnWpkIPXYXF6PaLeetCCVmzFqaT4QQd7BcyUaAx+aiUtHJNcp KzEwYs3FdMRig== Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 17:38:29 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Joe Damato Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/5] netdev: fix repeated netlink messages in queue dumps Message-ID: <20241213173829.305b8048@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20241213152244.3080955-1-kuba@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks for the reviews! On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 13:52:11 -0800 Joe Damato wrote: > Patches 3, 4, and 5 seem like new features, though. Should those > three be a separate series against net-next, instead? Right, this case is a bit disputable. Docs and selftests can't really break the current release. And someone who backports the fixes should be able to easily test them. Also, thinking selfishly as a maintainer, having them in one series saves me mental tracking of who promised to send tests via another tree and hasn't posted them yet.