From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com, andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com,
Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>,
Kalesh AP <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com>,
Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] bnxt_en: Skip reading PXP registers during ethtool -d if unsupported
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 06:59:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241219065953.73e08f77@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACKFLimq7juLHbEs9gbuzRm7mFGvD62RsgrXdxr-fmj5e+zBbw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 22:57:09 -0800 Michael Chan wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 10:26:19 -0800 Michael Chan wrote:
> > > Newer firmware does not allow reading the PXP registers during
> > > ethtool -d, so skip the firmware call in that case. Userspace
> > > (bnxt.c) always expects the register block to be populated so
> > > zeroes will be returned instead.
> >
> > We have both the ability to return the number of registers (regs_len),
> > and the regs->version. Are you sure you don't want to use either option
> > to let user space know the regs aren't there?
>
> The existing bnxt.c in userspace since 2020 always assumes that the
> beginning part always contains the PXP register block regardless of
> regs->version as long as the register length >= the length of the
> register block. I guess we didn't anticipate that this PXP block
> would ever be changed or FW would disallow reading it.
So if you bumped the version the existing userspace wouldn't care but
then you _could_ follow up and update user space to ignore these
registers when version is 1?
It's alright, it's just debug, I got curious recently about how little
use the version field gets. I'm not sure anyone has a good idea on
what to do with it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-19 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-17 18:26 [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] bnxt_en: Driver update Michael Chan
2024-12-17 18:26 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] bnxt_en: Use FW defined resource limits for RoCE Michael Chan
2024-12-17 18:26 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] bnxt_en: Do not allow ethtool -m on an untrusted VF Michael Chan
2024-12-17 18:26 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/6] bnxt_en: Skip PHY loopback ethtool selftest if unsupported by FW Michael Chan
2024-12-17 18:26 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/6] bnxt_en: Skip MAC loopback selftest if it is " Michael Chan
2024-12-18 8:44 ` Michal Swiatkowski
2024-12-17 18:26 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] bnxt_en: Skip reading PXP registers during ethtool -d if unsupported Michael Chan
2024-12-19 3:13 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-12-19 6:57 ` Michael Chan
2024-12-19 14:59 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-12-19 17:53 ` Michael Chan
2024-12-19 19:18 ` Michael Chan
2024-12-17 18:26 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/6] MAINTAINERS: bnxt_en: Add Pavan Chebbi as co-maintainer Michael Chan
2024-12-20 2:20 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] bnxt_en: Driver update patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241219065953.73e08f77@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com \
--cc=somnath.kotur@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).