From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org, willemb@google.com,
petrm@nvidia.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests: drv-net: assume stats refresh is 0 if no ethtool -c support
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 06:22:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241220062214.3e8823ac@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e933e67f-66f2-422b-b00e-09ae788ed51d@lunn.ch>
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 10:09:06 +0100 Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > @@ -234,7 +234,12 @@ from .remote import Remote
> > Good drivers will tell us via ethtool what their sync period is.
> > """
> > if self._stats_settle_time is None:
> > - data = ethtool("-c " + self.ifname, json=True)[0]
> > + data = {}
> > + try:
> > + data = ethtool("-c " + self.ifname, json=True)[0]
> > + except CmdExitFailure as e:
> > + if "Operation not supported" not in e.cmd.stderr:
> > + raise
>
> How important is this time to the test itself?
Just to be clear (because unfortunately git doesn't do a good job of
calling out Python method names in the diff :() this is part of a
method called wait_hw_stats_settle() within the test env class.
It's used by various tests which use/check device stats.
> If it is not available,
> can the test just default to 50ms and keep going? I would of thought
> we find more issues by running the test too slowly, than not running
> it at all, unless having the wrong timer makes it more flaky.
We already use zero for majority of driver which don't report stat
refresh:
data.get('stats-block-usecs', 0) / 1000 / 1000
^^^
this patch just does the same thing not only if the driver doesn't
report 'stats-block-usecs' but also if it doesn't support -c at all.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-20 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-20 0:31 [PATCH net-next] selftests: drv-net: assume stats refresh is 0 if no ethtool -c support Jakub Kicinski
2024-12-20 9:09 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-12-20 14:22 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-12-20 15:03 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-12-21 4:05 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-12-23 18:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241220062214.3e8823ac@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).